Re: Just to be clear... -- Panitz Murder Trial Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2 ]

Subject: Re: Just to be clear...

Author:
Nettie

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:46:19 04/05/02 Fri
In reply to: Ginger 's message, "Just to be clear..." on 08:00:26 04/05/02 Fri

Depends on who "all" is. I can't answer for anyone else here. Just for myself.

I could not possibly say which players, if any, in this trial lied. I wasn't there when Nancy died. I can't even give you a gut-impression because CTV denied us seeing the trial.

I did point out that someone coming to the forum with the sole purpose of slinging mud at Eleanor and her credit rating was less than accurate in their statements. This does lend some credibility to Eleanor and what she says.

I will admit, it's difficult to believe that so many people would be in collusion to send an innocent man to prison. However, I have personal knowledge of just such a thing happening in another case, so I cannot say it's impossible. You would be amazed to know how easily this could happen. All you really need is one or two people with authority to have an agenda. They might not even have the SAME agenda. There are many ways to manipulate evidence in a trial. From withholding pertinent information from medical examiners and "experts" to actually exerting pressure on witnesses to change their stories to having one of the players following a Hollywood script for a movie being made about the case.

While this case is completely different from the one I speak of, without credible evidence to the contrary I can't completely discount Eleanor's beliefs either.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]