Re: Background of the case -- Panitz Murder Trial Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject:

Re: Background of the case

Author:
Gina

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:35:26 03/01/02 Fri
In reply to: Chris 's message, "Background of the case" on 13:12:38 03/01/02 Fri

I read the background info from CTV and found it very informative - at least now I know more about the saga. I will say, to Chris, I totally agree that the "he didn't do it" defense looks pretty thin up against the DNA evidence, shoeprint on Campbell's face, the severe beating she endured, Ralf fleeing to Canada, etc., not to mention the blood (her blood) that was found on Ralf's shoes. I have heard that GNF never takes a case he doesn't believe in and I am convinced he means it. So... I have to think he has some cards that haven't played yet. If he can pull this out, he is truly a magician. I'm keeping a good thought (and all my fingers crossed). A note to Eleanor: I've read your posts and you sound like an intelligent lady with ego intact; What in God's name ever possessed you to get involved in this mess with Ralf and the ex-? That is not a criticism of you, but rather a commentary on the Springer show which is such low-life garbage (IMHO) I can't believe he's still on the air. Must be love !!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]