New GTO -- C6 Firebird Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:20:39 03/12/02 Tue
Author: Jason Kelly
Subject: New GTO

Forget about a new GTO! It should stay in the past where it belongs. If Pontiac is going to let the muscle car live on, it should do so through the Firebird. We are living in a time when the up and coming drivers were not even around to drive a GTO. In the present, it is just a name of car that just did not make it. Why push it now? When the Firebird died, countless people stood up and voiced their outrage. Where are the legions of GTO fans. Back in the 1960's, that's where. The Firebird has already had vitality in the new driver age. Not to mention it has held its own for 35 years. If one of these cars deserves a chance, it is the FIREBIRD.

Thank You

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Re: New GTO -- Matthew Burns, 11:20:43 03/14/02 Thu

>Forget about a new GTO! It should stay in the past
>where it belongs. If Pontiac is going to let the
>muscle car live on, it should do so through the
>Firebird. We are living in a time when the up and
>coming drivers were not even around to drive a GTO.
>In the present, it is just a name of car that just did
>not make it. Why push it now? When the Firebird
>died, countless people stood up and voiced their
>outrage. Where are the legions of GTO fans. Back in
>the 1960's, that's where. The Firebird has already
>had vitality in the new driver age. Not to mention it
>has held its own for 35 years. If one of these cars
>deserves a chance, it is the FIREBIRD.
>
>Thank You
Couldn't agree more