Re: c-not-of-c Contributions update? -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:53:35 09/08/11 Thu
Author: john
Subject: Re: c-not-of-c Contributions update?
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: c-not-of-c Contributions update?" on 19:49:38 09/07/11 Wed

george;

you response does not answer my question.

john

>>George!
>>
>>ROFLOL!
>>
>>why does lois bother with the cofchrist? i think that
>>you post more and talk more about the cofchrist than
>>many cofchrist members i know!
>>
>>why do either of you bother if you have walked away?
>>
>>john
>
>John, when I become a big enough apostate to join the
>NCC, I will be able to walk away. That may sound
>paradoxical. AFter, all you would say that if I
>believe (or disbelieve) the same way that you do,
>there'd no longer be a conflict, but the opposite is
>true. When I get to the point that I believe the exact
>same things that you do -- that the Bible means the
>Massoretic Text and the Wescott and Hort Greek text,
>that the BoM and the D&C are not scripture, but just a
>head game hobby of false prophets, and that Joseph
>Smith, Jr. did not restore the Christian church, there
>will nothing left in the CofC for me. Then you can
>finish it off by having sodomy demonstrations on the
>podium at Conference, for all I would care.
>
>Your attempts to "revision" the church are looking
>more and more like the wise-guy's attempt to muscle in
>on Pepsi by coming up with "New Coke." We all remember
>that debacle. Nobody wants New Coke. The people who
>like Pepsi will keep drinking Pepsi. And nobody really
>likes "New RLDS," either. Those who like Protestantism
>will just keep being Protestant.
>
>
>You are just peddling a product, John, and the push to
>imitate someone else's product just demonstrates that
>even the CofC itself really doesn't believe in it's
>own product.
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: c-not-of-c Contributions update? -- George, 07:32:53 09/08/11 Thu