Re: Those Dropping In -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:51:56 06/14/12 Thu
Author: George
Subject: Re: Those Dropping In
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: Those Dropping In" on 10:09:33 06/14/12 Thu

>>>>Those of you who are dropping in to throw us some
>>spin
>>>>propaganda on the upcoming imposition of homosexual
>>>>ordination, and same-sex marriage (with all its
>>>>aliases and permutations) on the RLDS church, please
>>>>state your position in the church, layman, priest,
>>>>elder, seventy, patriarch, apostle, bishop,
>>president,
>>>>etc.
>>>>
>>>>That disclosure will clarify any possible conflict
>of
>>>>interest
>>>>
>>>>Our former patriarch/matriarch/evangelist in
>>residence
>>>>on this forum kept his/her position secret for over
>>>>two years, and the conflict of interest in his/her
>>>>posts was not declared.
>>>>
>>>>We had to discover his/her identity and his/her
>>>>position by doing a search of other websites. Had
>>>>he/she declared his/her office in the church, it
>>would
>>>>not have been necessary to find out his/her name to
>>>>discover what that position is. To show what a cat
>>and
>>>>mouse game it was, he/she denied his/her own name
>>>>because the poster who asked about the identity
>>>>accidentally misspelled it.
>>>>
>>>>George
>>>
>>>Oh yes, and also if you hold none of the
>>>aforementioned titles but are employed by the cofc,
>>>either by the World Church or Mission Center.
>>>
>>>Lois
>>
>>Yeah, Lois. I think anyone who posts here can remain
>>anonymous if they choose to do so. However, if they
>>are toadies of the leadership and trying to conceal
>>it, we must of necessity find out their name to find
>>out who they are.
>>
>>It would be a lot easier if someone just said, "I'm
>>posting here because I'm an evangelist in the CofC,"
>>or "I'm posting here because I'm a priest in the
>>CofC," or "I'm posting here because I'm a homosexual
>>elder in the CofC." Then names wouldn't be necessary.
>>The name is merely a badge of identity. The indentity
>>is underneath it, and that is what we need to know.
>>
>>Of course, after reading the posts for a while, we
>>could figure out who's signing the paychecks, and/or
>>giving the promotions, but that's a lot of work, and
>>(as I pointed out already) requires the discovery of
>>the person's name in the process.
>>
>>What if a news anchor were a high ranking member of a
>>known political party. Shouldn't he disclose that?
>>
>>George
>
>One of my friends noted that in the cofc jurisdiction
>here there were ordinations, about 75% of those were
>women. That has been the pattern for quite a while
>now. And it has been over 30 years now since 156, so I
>don't believe that is catch up. It is the emasculation
>of the institution.
>
>Soon there will be a similar phenomenon. The
>ordinations will be 75% homosexuals, and a token
>number of heterosexuals.
>
>Lois

That is just another example of the cyclic fulfilment of the Isaiah prophecy: "I will give them women and boys to be their rulers." Clue to liberals -- it's a punishment for disobedience and willfulness.

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]