Re: The Propaganda slip (Was: freudian slip) -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:03:18 06/17/12 Sun
Author: George
Subject: Re: The Propaganda slip (Was: freudian slip)
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: The Propaganda slip (Was: freudian slip)" on 21:43:34 06/17/12 Sun

>>>>>I just saw that someone says that after the
>>>Australian
>>>>>National Conference, in which they condoned
>>>>>homosexuality in the church, that the World Church
>>>>>announced the derision/statement that same evening.
>>>>>
>>>>>Susan Skoor wants to make sure that the Canadians
>do
>>>>>not announce their decision before the World Church
>>>>>can.
>>>>>
>>>>>I wonder what will be their derision/statement?
>>>>>
>>>>>ROTFL
>>>>>
>>>>>Lois
>>>>
>>>>is "derision" the freudian slip?
>>>>
>>>>I guess this problem with the timing of the
>>>>announcement is an Obama/Biden-moment-type deja
>>>>boo-boo.
>>>>
>>>>George
>>>
>>>Yes, "derision" is the slip. Honesty by mistake.
>>>
>>>Lois
>>
>>Lois, notice that the document below identifies the
>>Community of Christ as having "almost a quarter of a
>>million members." Since this is not true, but is
>>merely propaganda rolled over from forty years ago,
>>when the church was still Christian and actually
>>had that many members on the rolls, it is
>>likely that most of the rest of the "facts" in the
>>statement are probably stretched to the breaking point
>>as well.
>>
>>The CofC has only about 114,000 members on the rolls
>>worldwide. That is the number who still are officially
>>counted as members. There are less than 40,000 active
>>members worldwide. An "active member" is a person who
>>has attended one single worship service in the
>>last year, or who has made one single monetary
>>contribution in the last year.
>>
>>So, rather than being an impressive cloud of witnesses
>>for the divinity of homosexuality, this whole thing
>>turns out to be what most liberal boondoggles are -- a
>>few self-appointed eltistist cultural jihadis trying
>>to push their fanatic views on the rest of the
>>population. Considering that the world has over 5
>>billion people, and the Christian Church is composed
>>of well over a billion, the very divine opinions of
>>one tiny church like the CofC are not evidence of
>>change in the hearts of Christians, but of the same
>>religious totalitarianism that used to go on during
>>the Middle Ages. And combining the CofC with the
>>waning apostate Protestant denominations of the NCC
>>does not add to the impression of spiritual strength,
>>either.
>>
>>Note to saints in India, Africa, and Latin America:
>>Don't think that geographic separation, or the
>>existence of your own "national council" can save you
>>from this. The propagandists of the CofC insist that
>>the CofC is a world church, and whatever it does is
>>going to be on your doorstep sooner or later.
>>
>>In 2003, the person who wrote a letter (expressing
>>disapproval of homosexualization of our culture) to
>>the editor of the newspaper in Polk County Texas was
>>rather shocked when I wrote him and told him that
>>there was a mission of the Community of Christ only
>>about five miles from his doorstep. You see, the
>>problem is closer to home that the propagandists want
>>anyone to realize.
>>
>>George
>
>George,
>
>Well of course it will right on their doorstep! As a
>matter of fact it will be right in their pulpit as
>soon as possible.
>
>Report from Fran Manning, Independence:
>World Conference � Day 4 April 13, 2010
>
>�A question was asked of the chair�Can division or
>harm come to the church should we approve of
>homosexuality in the USA. President David Schaal
>answered, �Yes, that is possible, that�s why the
>�Words of Counsel� says it is not proper to make this
>okay world wide, it will just be acceptable in
>countries where homosexuality is approved of as
>acceptable moral behavior.
>
>He did go on to say that if you are a homosexual
>who is ordained here in the USA your ordination would
>be approved of the church wherever you served.�
>
>In other words people of India, Africa and Latin
>America, and quite possibly Asia as well, listen up.
>If someone in the Australia, Canada, or the U.S.A. is
>a homosexual and ordained they will not deny them the
>right to exercise their priesthood in your country, no
>matter how you feel about. It is kind of like the
>lesbian wedding in Oregon, U.S.A. in which they didn't
>give a fig about how anyone in the congregation felt
>about it.
>
>Lois

Lois, that is the political maneuvering typical of leftist politics. When a proposal came up for an Amendment to the federal constitution banning same sex marriage, the leftists and homosexual activists said, "That's not necessary. Each state can decide for itself what it wants to do." So the amendment was put aside.

Of course, anytime a liberal speaks of state's rights, he is not to be trusted. As soon as some of the state supreme courts interpreted some state constititutions as permitting same sex marriage, then any state whose population voted against same sex marriage was sued in federal court to overturn the state's "decision for itself."

And that is how the Community of Christ proposes to do this as well. It is a leftwing political party hiding under the tax exemption of a defunct church. The CofC will say that this is effective only in the jurisdictions that want it, and then it will be forced on everyone else.

The Community of Christ dealership is as insanely dedicated to the proposition of same sex marriage as the Utah fundamentalist sects (with whom the LDS does not want to be associated) are to the proposition of plural marriage. Same sex marriage is also known as "sacramental sodomy", just as plural marriage is also known as "sacramental adultery."

This, of course, has not come about because of a sea change in the opinion of the American people, or the members of the RLDS church. It has come about because of the identity of the person in the White House. This person's proclivities have been known since day one, as well as his support for homosexual marriage, and the dealership is trying to strike while the iron is hot.

After all, the same-sex shacking up ceremonies came about close to the period that the previous prohomosexual President was in office, but slacked off after he left office, due to the uphill battle they faced, but in November 2008, it was "Glory Hallelujah" to the Obamessiah.

Of course, when western civilization caves in, the entire world won't necessarily go back into the Dark Ages. But the western countries will. And since churches and other religious organizations have great political dominion during Dark Ages, the CofC dealership will be in hog heaven.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: The Propaganda slip (Was: freudian slip) -- George, 22:41:02 06/17/12 Sun

Re: The Propaganda slip (Was: freudian slip) -- Lois, 00:03:43 06/18/12 Mon

Re: The Propaganda slip (Was: freudian slip) -- George, 07:23:53 06/18/12 Mon