Re: About Anger -- The Answer -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:57:08 11/10/11 Thu
Author: john
Subject: Re: About Anger -- The Answer
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: About Anger -- The Answer" on 18:09:41 11/09/11 Wed

i was offering my "opinion" based on the things he has to say. why must everything be so confrontational with you lois?

i don't know that i have ever run into a person named "Lois" who has a pleasant disposition...

john

>>>>>and just how much "truth" can you get indignant
>>about
>>>>>when you don't believe that homosexuals are the
>>>>>children of God?
>>>>>
>>>>>i am starting to believe that you, like lois,
>>>wouldn't
>>>>>know truth if it bit you on the behind...
>>especially
>>>>>when you get what you get from what you posted
>about
>>>>>price.
>>>>>
>>>>>john
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>John, I'm going to have to pull a "Matt" and tell
>>you,
>>>>John, that you are being even more dishonest by
>>>>claiming that I don't believe that homosexuals are
>>>>children of God. If they weren't his children, he
>>>>wouldn't care what they did. And neither would I.
>>>>
>>>>So please post the quote from any of my posts
>>anywhere
>>>>on the internet that says I don't believe that
>>>>homosexuals are children of God. Your fantasies are
>>>>not a legitimate part of the internet, so they are
>>not
>>>>the place to find quotes from me.
>>>>
>>>>I have a lot more to say on this subject, but lets
>>>>have the quote first. Ball's in your court.
>>>>
>>>>George
>>>
>>>George,
>>>
>>>He'll pull the same thing on you that he did on me.
>>>He'll say he remembers that you said it, but that it
>>>was so long ago that he can't remember where or when,
>>>blah blah blah.
>>>
>>>Lois
>>>
>>that would be lois, that unlike you and those of your
>>"ilk" i do not save scads and scads of posts from
>>others, especially not those with whom i disagree...
>>
>>it isn't hard to find posts anymore where you bend the
>>truth to your agenda and make nastiness...
>>
>>john
>
>But john, when you make specific accusations you had
>better back it up. Your specific accusation was that
>George does not believe that homosexuals are children
>of God. The burden of proof lies with you. The reason
>you can't offer the proof is because it doesn't exist.
>
>Lois
>
> >href="http://www.cofchrist.org/news/2009/nov/wclc.asp">
>http://www.cofchrist.org/news/2009/nov/wclc.asp
>Group Discusses Tough Issues
>�The setting was the Temple, where 47 members of the
>Expanded World Church Leadership Council and other
>leaders spent several days discussing culturally
>respectful standards of conduct. They emphasized
>issues such as same-sex marriage and ordination of
>lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgendered members.�
>Some asked why the topics even needed to be discussed.
>President Veazey replied:
>�Something has to happen�that helps us resolve this
>tension that is beginning to sap the energy of the
>church in some areas�so we can focus on missional
>endeavors.
>�We are�at a very serious juncture.� Now is the time
>to gain a better sense of the way we want to approach
>the journey into the future.�

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: About Anger -- The Answer -- George, 21:46:06 11/10/11 Thu