Re: About Anger -- The Answer -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:17:20 11/11/11 Fri
Author: George
Subject: Re: About Anger -- The Answer
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: About Anger -- The Answer" on 20:05:09 11/11/11 Fri

>
>>>>the buildings belonged to world church. the members
>>>>were in the wrong.
>>>>
>>>>the cofchrist was also in the wrong for acting in a
>>>>heavy handed manner. president veasy has apologized
>>>>for that. i would expect you to accept the apology
>>>>though... i am not surprised you left. you don't
>>>>seem to play well with others...
>>>>
>>>>john
>>>
>>>john,
>>>
>>>An empty and meaningless apology from Steve Veazey.
>>>The dispossessed church members have nothing to
>>>apologize for.
>>>
>>>Lois
>>>
>>i guess that, would be a matter of opinion.
>>
>>i don't believe that steve veasy requested that the
>>folks who left should apologize... not that i would
>>EVER expect to see an apology from you, even for those
>>things you do that are patently dishonest...
>>
>>but, we have talked about lois and lies before...
>>
>>john
>
>But if the members were truly "in the wrong" wouldn't
>it be called for for them to apologize? But they
>weren't in the wrong. The church leadership was and
>still is in the wrong.
>
>Lois

The First Presidency is like a wayward husband who demands that his wife forgive him so he won't feel so bad about having moved his girlfriend into the house with her. After all, he reasons that if his wife really loved Jesus and was a good Christian, she wouldn't want him to feel guilty about continuing his adultery right under her nose. The First Presidency's conceptual problem runs so deep, there can't possibly be any communication or reconciliation.

And that's the gospel message John has to offer us is the exact duplicate of the FP's mess -- the equivalent of "forgive us, d_mn you!"

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: About Anger -- The Answer -- john, 14:26:17 11/12/11 Sat