Re: This is what's next on the liberal agenda. -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:12:29 08/25/11 Thu
Author: George
Subject: Re: This is what's next on the liberal agenda.
In reply to: SOL 's message, "Re: This is what's next on the liberal agenda." on 20:09:23 08/25/11 Thu

>>>and yet statistics show that the vast majority of
>>>pedophiles are straight... go figure...
>>>
>>>john
>>>
>>
>>Well, John, if you are still alive by the time the
>>same tactics used to convince you to buy into same sex
>>marraige get turned on you by the pedophiles, are you
>>going to bowl over as easily as you did the first
>time?
>>
>>Morality is morality, John. It can't be subdivided and
>>remodeled piece-meal.
>>
>>Acceptance of fornication leads to acceptance of
>>adultery. Acceptance of adultery leads to acceptance
>>of same-sex marriage (which, like the other two, is
>>just another nail in the coffin of Christian
>>marriage.) The only question here is whether
>>pedophiles or polygamists are going to be the next to
>>jump on the bandwagon.
>>
>>Since you are a priest of the CofC, and the CofC has
>>official ceremonies for "blessing" the sexual
>>cohabitation of unmarried couples, married (but not to
>>each other couples), and same sex couples, you are
>>already to the next fork in the road.
>>
>>Of course, when you reach it, you can always break
>>down in uncontrollable laughter.
>>
>>George
>Actually morality is perhaps one of the most relative
>commodities there is. So I think it can be divided
>and parsed and piece-mealed. It happens all the time
>and has throughout history.
>It is when someone tries to exert her morality on
>another that problems arise. That is much more
>dangerous than the slippery slope scenario that you
>propose.
>
>I will regret accepting the invitation to come here I
>am sure.
>
>Sean

Hi Sean.

Your notion of "relativity" is completely inapplicable to Christian doctrine.

Can you clarify for us what position you are taking, so that we can evaluate whether you are serious, or just jerking us around.

Since the free and open practice of homosexuality has not been acceptable to any mainline religion (except, perhaps, Buddhism) since religion began, the notion that homosexuality is on the table for Christians, or civilized moderates of any sort is completely wrong-headed. Comparing it to something like slavery, or polygamy, or casino gambling just doesn't wash.

Even the Community of Christ has removed the names of some of its apostles from its website, because it knows that the societies in which these apostles are assigned do not accept homosexuality, and (unlike the "bigoted, small minded, and evil" population on this forum) try to kill homosexuals whenever they can.)

If you want to take something that isn't yours by right, you find the person who will offer the least resistance, and then you take what you want. That is what is being done in Western societies, which do not have the intestinal fortitude to stand up to homosexual nihilists. If these activists really wanted to help someone, they'd go to India, or some other country and help homosexuals avoid being killed by people who actually are intolerant, instead of hanging around outside institutions in the U.S. imposing themselves on civilized and polite people, whom they nevertheless vent their wrath upon.

And, Sean, if you came here to defend the indefensible, you may be sorry. But that depends on what makes you sorry, and I almost have less knowledge of that than John does of covenant ceremonies.

George

Car shouting: A mating practice in which teenage boys lean out the window and yell suggestive remarks at females walking down the street from the safety of their vehicle. If they eventually get brave enough, they will shout these remarks at women under 50.
Alfred E. Neumann

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: This is what's next on the liberal agenda. -- George, 22:32:54 08/25/11 Thu