Re: The Demands for Justice or for Injustice?/�Demandas que la Justicia o para la Injusticia? -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:03:05 09/27/11 Tue
Author: john
Subject: Re: The Demands for Justice or for Injustice?/�Demandas que la Justicia o para la Injusticia?
In reply to: George 's message, "The Demands for Justice or for Injustice?/�Demandas que la Justicia o para la Injusticia?" on 08:42:49 09/26/11 Mon

where did you see this:

"High Priest Quorum passed a resolution urging the First Presidency to declare a moratorium on priesthood silencing of gay priesthood members while dialogue continues in the church."

in the article you linked to george? i couldn't find it...

john

>The Demands for Justice Continue to Be Demands for
>Injustice
>
>High Priest Quorum passed a resolution urging the
>First Presidency to declare a moratorium on priesthood
>silencing of gay priesthood members while dialogue
>continues in the church.
>
> >href="http://welcomingcommunitynetwork.org/timeline.htm
>">http://welcomingcommunitynetwork.org/timeline.htm
>
>Since the homosexual community has made such headway
>by equating civil rights for homosexuals with civil
>rights for African Americans, take a look at how
>unjust this resolution appears. What if the High
>Priest quorum had passed a resolution urging the
>following:
>
>That the First Presidency to declare a moratorium on
>priesthood silencing of black priesthood members while
>dialgue continues in the church.
>
>Or passed a resolution urging a moratorium on
>executions of black men on death row.
>
>Do only homosexual priests deserve protection from
>silencing?
>Do only black men deserve protection from capital
>punishment?
>
>Why not ban silencing altogether as "cruel and
>unusual?" That would be just and fair to all concerned.
>
>George
>
>Las Demandas que la Justicia Permanezca Demandas
>para la Injusticia
>
> Qu�rum Alto de Sacerdote pas� una resoluci�n que
>urge la Presidencia Primera para declarar una
>moratoria sobre el sacerdocio que silencia de miembros
>homosexuals de sacerdocio mientras di�logo contin�a en
>la iglesia.
>
> >href="http://welcomingcommunitynetwork.org/timeline.htm
>">http://welcomingcommunitynetwork.org/timeline.htm
>
>
>
>
>Porque la comunidad homosexual ha hecho tal progreso
>por igualar derechos civiles para homosexuales con
>derechos civiles para Estadounidenses Africanos, tomar
>una mirada cuan injusta esta resoluci�n aparece. Qu�
>si el qu�rum Alto de Sacerdote hab�a pasado una
>resoluci�n que urge el siguiente:
>
>Que la Presidencia Primera para declarar una moratoria
>sobre el sacerdocio que silencia de miembros negros de
>sacerdocio mientras el dialogo contin�a en la iglesia.
>
>O pas� una resoluci�n que urge una moratoria sobre
>ejecuciones de hombres negros sobre la fila de muerte.
>
>� Merecen los sacerdotes homosexuals �nicos protecci�n
>desde silenciar?
>� Merecen los hombres negros �nicos protecci�n desde
>el castigo capital?
>
>� Por qu� no prohibir silenciando enteramente como
>"fiero y raro?" Que ser honrado y iqual por todos
>concernieron.
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: The Demands for Justice or for Injustice?/�Demandas que la Justicia o para la Injusticia? -- Lois, 09:34:35 09/27/11 Tue
- Re: The Demands for Justice or for Injustice?/�Demandas que la Justicia o para la Injusticia? -- George, 21:30:36 09/27/11 Tue