Re: General Denominational (Dis)Information -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:28:58 09/08/11 Thu
Author: George
Subject: Re: General Denominational (Dis)Information
In reply to: john 's message, "Re: General Denominational (Dis)Information" on 06:37:38 09/08/11 Thu

>can you provide references/proof for the following
>statement, George?
>
> "the CofC had to state that it rejects the
>Inspired Version, the BoM, and the D&C."
>
>i am certainly glad that i am around to dispell the
>"disinformation" that seems to be posted in this
>thread!
>
>john
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>there is a great deal of difference between
>>revelation
>>>>and scripture George!
>>>>
>>>>john
>>>>
>>>john,
>>>
>>>I think we all know that section 164 is definitely
>not
>>>revelation.
>>>
>>>Lois
>>
>>And John can't even believe it is scripture. In order
>>to be eligible for membership in the NCC, the CofC had
>>to state that it rejects the Inspired Version, the
>>BoM, and the D&C. You see, member denominations of the
>>NCC can accept only the Bible as found in the extant
>>manuscripts. The apocrypha is grudgingly accepted as
>>authentic because ancient mss. of it exist, even
>>though the NCC members "agree to disagree" about the
>>canon. But ALL NCC members are required to know for a
>>fact that NOTHING other than the Bible is scripture.
>>In order to get into the NCC, the CofC has been forced
>>to clandestinely adopt an extreme antiMormon stance.
>>
>>The nature of scripture is very volatile for the
>>CofCer. It makes extremely radical transmutations,
>>depending upon the venue.
>>
>>George

John, are you absolutely, completely, and totally in the dark about the membership requirements for the NCC?

When it was told that the CofC had joined the NCC, that was all that was necessary to know.

You are beginning to sound like Nancy Pelosi examining the bowl before she flushes: "We are going to have to pass it to find out what's in it." Did any of you look into the National Council of Churches at all, or did you just go with the flow?

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]