Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:57:06 09/20/11 Tue
Author: john
Subject: Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies" on 19:40:57 09/20/11 Tue

he was quite obviously unrepentant in the stuff that i read... would more time have changed anything?

john

>>>>I notice, John, that though you have undertaken
>>>>yeoman's work of refuting everything on this forum,
>I
>>>>haven't seen you mention anything that Richard Price
>>>>printed about you and your bosses that isn't true.
>>>>
>>>>The only thing that O.C. could come up with in the
>>>>silencing interview was the alleged falsehood that
>>the
>>>>leadership intended to take the church into the
>CofC.
>>>>Everything else was unfounded and unsupported
>>>>accusation. And, we now know that the sole example
>>of
>>>>a lie allegedly told by Price turned out to be a lie
>>>>actually told by O.C. Henson at the prompting and
>>>>scripting of the First Presidency.
>>>>
>>>>Let's hope you can stick with the party line, John,
>>>>because if you don't, they'll hold a kangaroo court
>>of
>>>>this sort for you.
>>>>
>>>>George
>>
>>>it was certainly no kangaroo court...
>>>
>>>john
>>>
>>john,
>>
>>Since a kangaroo court has already determined the
>>verdict before the trial starts I would say that you
>>are correct.
>>
>>O.C. Hinson thought he would be able to get Richard
>>Price to retract everything that Richard had put
>>together from all the evidence. O.C. Hinson was
>>incorrect. But shaming and intimidation does work on a
>>great many weak willed people.
>>
>>Lois
>>
>>THE SILENCING OF RICHARD PRICE
>>Transcript of tape recording of "settlement
>>conference" with O.C. Hinson
>>
>>March 12th, 1985
>>
>>O.C. Hinson: "I'm sure over the last ten years you've
>>given some consideration to the fact that Price may
>>have to pay the price...."
>
>
>Notice that John's answer to my question about a Stake
>President lying under the orders of the First
>Presidency was nothing but a criticism of something
>else in the post.
>
>But I still think it was a kangaroo court. Even if
>Price had caved in and repented of the sin of
>believing that truth is not relative, he was not given
>time to retract in print any of his statements. So it
>didn't matter if he recanted or not.
>
>If this type of "justice" were served up in a secular
>environment, or a nonpostChristian church, CofCer's
>would be out front protesting, shouting, "No peace
>without justice!"
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies -- George, 23:12:09 09/20/11 Tue