Re: Already determined the outcome? 2 -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:21:46 04/06/11 Wed
Author: john
Subject: Re: Already determined the outcome? 2
In reply to: Mamusz 's message, "Re: Already determined the outcome? 2" on 08:40:08 04/06/11 Wed

the list lois left... i should have known better...

i couldn't get her link to open... just as well anyway.

john

>>what makes you think that list of people were
>>homosexuals?
>>
>>john
>>
>>
>
>John,
>where did I say everyone on the list was a homosexual?
> What list? Are they?
>
>Mamusz
>
>
>>>> >>>>href="http://www.cofchrist.org/usaconf/journey.asp">
>h
>>t
>>>t
>>>>p://www.cofchrist.org/usaconf/journey.asp
>>>>Journeying Toward a USA National Conference
>>>>BY THE USA APOSTOLIC TEAM
>>>>
>>>>Q: Has church leadership already determined the
>>>>outcome on issues of same-gender marriage and
>>>>ordaining people in same-gender relationships?
>>>>
>>>>A: No, church leadership is committed to discernment
>>>>leading to the USA National Conference. This process
>>>>will include spiritual practices, dialogue,
>scripture
>>>>reflection, and study of credible resources that
>>>>provide multiple perspectives on human sexuality and
>>>>healthy, faithful, and committed relationships.
>>>>--------
>>>>
>>>>I don't believe that. Does anybody reading this
>>>>believe that? Following is a list of Community of
>>>>Christ staff members. Are you going to tell me that
>>>>they aren�t going to be putting their full weight
>>into
>>>>getting homosexual marriages and ordinations into
>the
>>>>life of the church?
>>>>--------
>>>>
>>>> >>>>href="http://welcomingcommunitynetwork.org/WCNnews20
>1
>>0
>>>O
>>>>ct.pdf">http://welcomingcommunitynetwork.org/WCNnews
>2
>>0
>>>1
>>>>0Oct.pdf
>>>>
>>>>WCNnewsletter October 2010 Volume 4 Issue 9 page 1
>>>>
>>>>Charlie Robison, evangelist
>>>>
>>>> >>>>href="http://www.cofchrist.org/directory/staff1.asp#
>a
>>"
>>>>
>>>>http://www.cofchrist.org/directory/staff1.asp#a
>>>>
>>>>Diane Sadler Disciple Formation Project�Resource
>>>>Specialist
>>>>
>>>>Doug Rottering Temple Bookstore Associate
>>>>
>>>>Peter Judd Worship and Consultant to Integrated
>>>>Formation Ministries
>>>>
>>>>Kris Judd President of Seventy Missionary
>>>>Coordinator
>>>>
>>>>Lauren Hall Project Manager-Hymnal
>>>>-----
>>>>
>>>>Submitted by Lois
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >>>>href="http://www.cofchrist.org/OnlineResources/issue
>s
>>/
>>>1
>>>>982homosexuality.asp">http://www.cofchrist.org/Onlin
>e
>>R
>>>e
>>>>sources/issues/1982homosexuality.asp
>>>>
>>>>Homosexuality 1982 Statement by the Standing High
>>>>Council
>>>>
>>>>The church recognizes that there is a difference
>>>>between homosexual orientation and homosexual
>>activity
>>>>(defined as sexual acts between persons of the same
>>>>sex). The former is accepted as a condition over
>>which
>>>>a person may have little or no control; the
>latter
>>>>is considered immoral and cannot be condoned by the
>>>>church.
>>>
>>>This kind of agrees with what I have been
>thinking
>>>for a very long time. The big "push" for the
>>>legitimacy of homosexuality in the COC in the USA is
>>>because there is much homosexuality in the hierarchy
>-
>>>either their children, siblings, or themselves. If
>>>not all, then many.
>>>
>>>The COC is really trying hard to make one believe
>that
>>>homosexuality is merely only another "normal"
>>>lifestyle. I have thought for a long time that that
>>>was the reason.
>>>
>>>Mamusz
>>>

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]