Re: Lies! -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:56:06 03/31/11 Thu
Author: George
Subject: Re: Lies!
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: Lies!" on 17:28:39 03/31/11 Thu

>>>Now, are you going to take back the ugly, judgmental
>>>things you said about heterosexuality?
>>>
>>>George
>
>>george;
>>
>>your recent statements are ludicrous... when have i
>>said anything ugly or judgemental about
>>heterosexuality?
>>
>>give your head a shake.
>>
>>john
>
>
>George,
>
>I don't remember seeing john saying anything
>judgmental about heterosexuality, although I don't
>read most of his posts.
>
>I did see him say this.
>
>"then you don't know me very well george. jsii was
>married and the statement i made about the affair was
>a quote from history... i don't mince words with folks
>married who fool around.
>
>john"
>
>This is the part I find interesting,
>"i don't mince words with folks married who fool
>around."
>
>I think he must only mean married people who fool
>around with the opposite gender.
>
>I say this because bisexuality is fooling around with
>someone of the same gender.
>
>Or is it?
>
>GALA, gay and lesbian acceptance, is not about
>repentance, it is about pride in their lifestyle and
>the demand to be recognized in the full life of the
>church in their unrepentant state. GALA is all about
>gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered
>persons.
>
>So the questions for john should be:
>
>Is it adultery for a married man to cheat on his wife
>with another man?
>
>Is it adultery for a married woman to cheat on her
>husband with another woman?
>
>If john can't answer those questions, NO!!!
>without mincing words then he is a hypocrite.
>
>Lois

You and I are tuned into the reality of the situation far better than John is.

In order to "discover" he was born homosexual, (I put the word "discover" in quotes, because I didn't "discover" that I was born Caucasian, or male, in middle age,) a man has to go out and have sex with another man. Now if this man is 41 years old and married with kids, he is cheating on his spouse. However, John, is very stern with the married heterosexual who is cheating. But in the case of the homosexual cheating on his wife, his inclination is judged to be irresistible. Thus, homosexuality is declared to be MORE irresistible than heterosexual behavior, because the married heterosexual is expected NOT to cheat on his wife. The homosexual, poor dear, is told that even with the grace of Jesus Christ and the power of the Holy Ghost that he cannot possibly resist having sex with another man.

The CofC's policy toward homosexuality sounds a lot like the elitist pigs in "Animal Farm," who declared "Some animals are more equal than others." Yet they are always dumping on us that we are insensitive, unfair, biased, prejudiced and bigoted. Their own insitutionalized bigotry just flies right over their heads.

And yes, John said that Joseph Smith, Jr.'s alleged "hook-up" with Fannie was "filthy." Why? Because JS, Jr. hadn't gotten "administrative approval" for a heterosexual shacking up ceremony to pledge his faithfulness in covenant to the woman he was cheating on his wife with. These shacking up ceremonies sound in some ways much like the Nauvoo "spiritual marriage" ceremonies that "administrators" had in their private offices in the temple and elsewhere.

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]