Re: ps -- b-zine hot gal's cafe

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Re: ps

Author:
cherry

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:02:45 07/04/01 Wed
In reply to: bamb 's message, "ps" on 03:00:07 07/04/01 Wed

hi bamb, long time to see. hope you're doing well. actually, not long time, coz i saw you online occasionally.

thx for your clarification. i did find it confusing.

as to the pros and cons of capital punishment, i find myself caught in between. i'm not a pro, but not a con either. i can only say that i'm not against it. even people are wrongly convicted, i don't think it makes much difference whether they are still "alive" when they've spent literally their whole life in prison. the difference may actually mean more to other people who feel release for having "spared" their lives. if life is all about trial of hardship, there you are then. if not, what's more cruel, death or life imprisonment? who knows? should we allow the convicted chance(s) to reconsider their act? all depends on whether you have faith in people's nature and conscience.

but i do feel unease to say that we can risk taking an innocent's life and sometimes prefer to put the person in a cage and altogether put the issue aside.

when i make people's nature and conscience a point, i'm drawing a difference between a person and an object. but i know the decision shouldn't be made by a ME. that's why i'm hesitating in front of the pro and con arguements.

'yee boh yik boh' never works and more often even distorts things, such as justice, but it's naked sadness that it's seemed as the last resort by some, such as "terrorists". but i want to distinguish those "terrorists" from more powerful TERROISTS who commit all kinds of terrorist act under a appearantly legitimate guise. they are passive and active terrorists.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: ps	bamb	05:26:33 07/05/01 Thu