Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Stange -- Peacock, Tuesday, October 28, 06:27:00pm [1]
it is easier to respond to you than Cindy as you show a true misunderstanding of not only what gets said in the political arena but what gets posted. No one has told anyone how they should feel. What is amusing is the guilt most seem not to accept when nothing accusatory was mentioned. Distortions are tolerable when it fits their agenda but exposing them appears to be accusatory. When one sees the overwhelming knee jerk response beyond what even is posted, one must wonder which side of the mouth are they posting from and as the apologist for all the world's status quo, you have amply used both sides of yours profusely. However I do concede that you have the right to use the word hypcrospy, as you are the formost practicioner of same.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Stange -- oldtimer#1, Tuesday, October 28, 09:57:35pm [1]
My, my Peacock are we again becoming a bit touchy, or should I use the word paranoid. Try reading and not revising. My response to Cindy had nothing to do with you. I took Cindy at his word and understood and agreed with the point he was making.
I don't know you nor have I examined your tax returns to have the faintest idea what you feel is your personal obligation, in terms of charitable contributions.The term hypocrite was reserved for those alluded by Cindy. Again, not you. I also have a better understanding than you think as to why you would want to pick a fight with me rather than Cindy.
Like figgyprez I now find you boring and a waste of my time. Go play games with others and keep me out of your posts as I will with you.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Stange -- Peacock, Saturday, November 01, 02:36:02pm [1]
You are the ultimate panderer. Cindy's comment was basically a personal comment and very vulnerable in some areas. However to make as blatant a statement that she knows how much Biden donates charitably is an example of preaching unsupportable statements. The fact that you practice your approval comments shows that you will pander to anything that floats your boat. As you state you have no idea to even what is on either's tax returns, shows that your approval has little to do with accuracy or substance. Now we might agree that Cindy donates more to SPC than Biden, but that would be a typical Sludge reply.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Stange -- SPC Dawg, Tuesday, November 04, 11:22:15pm [1]
Peacock you are a fool. Biden's tax returns over last several years were made public. Anyone can read them and know what his charitable contributions were.
Forum timezone: GMT-5 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |