Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Try reading the substance of the quote -- Peacock, Friday, June 27, 12:54:47pm [1]

that is if you recognize substance.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Whoaaaaaa there -- Sludge, Friday, June 27, 01:11:04pm [1]

Showing a little sensitivity, are we?

Was just looking for a little confirmation on what could be interpreted otherwise. Did not have any report of this other then was was mentioned here prior.

Anyway thanks for the substantive help.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> I only asked that you read what was written and their intent -- Peacock, Friday, June 27, 01:44:22pm [1]

I made no other comment. The subsatnce about what was written is clear for most, but necessarily accurate. Talk about sensitivity, In fact I am surprised you indicate no confirmation or denial considering your pipeline, Or for that matter the questions about available ships next year, considering graduation rates.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> My thoughts (not to be confused with substance) -- Sludge, Friday, June 27, 02:07:42pm [1]

Technically, we will have one to give. However Traore can likely have another year (medical), if all are willing.

Staff is out looking and, if I were to guess, given 'movements' that occur in many programs today, we could have two to give, notwithstanding the Traore ship.

Again, just a hunch, with certainly no pipeline info to add.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: My thoughts (not to be confused with substance) -- Peacock, Friday, June 27, 02:25:35pm [1]

Well substance would have to include a graduation and at least two leaving. We do have a showcase going on at Rutgers. That is about all I can read into your thoughts.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> No need for suspicion -- Sludge, Friday, June 27, 03:41:25pm [1]

More of a resonable get based on normal attrition.

Must admit, was surprised that we did not lose one or two to academics. Might suggest that, once past Admissions, hard to fail if the right courses/Profs. are in place.

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Reported from VA on June 15 -- E++ (Wary), Friday, June 27, 09:11:03am [1]

By my count Dunne has given 13 scholarships for next year only one of whom is a senior...if Conley attends SPC and qualifies for 2009, he would have to get Traore's spot leaving no room for any new players...is that right?

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Reported from VA on June 15 -- SPC Fan, Sunday, June 29, 10:16:27pm [1]

Bingo unless someone else leaves before next May

[ Edit | View ]