| [ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3 ] |
| Subject: Just For The Taste Of It Or Tasteless Controversy? | |
|
Author: Dennis S. Vogel |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 20:32:24 11/01/09 Sun I'm taking a chance again of offending some of you. Even if you’re offended, please learn the marketing lessons. I think Jim Collins was/is uneasy about using a tobacco company as an example of a great company in "Built to Last" & "Good To Great". Jim had a lesson to teach us & to do it; he took a chance of offending some people. If you've read some of my other posts, you may correctly figure I'm among those who are offended. Though I'm offended, I've willingly learned the lesson. Some think they have the right to pollute our air without providing a benefit. I know when I drive a car, I contribute to pollution, but at least there’s a legitimate purpose in driving. Some in the tobacco business adamantly defend the "right" to smoke. They’re passionate about producing tobacco products. The lesson is about passion, camaraderie & a common goal leading to business success. (I’ve tied in "Good To Great" in Part 2.) Below, there's a lesson based on some businesses, which some feel exploit women & are immoral besides. If women are exploited, then also men are exploited by 2 of them. There probably have been & are cases of adults being exploited. I doubt the examples I've used are among those. Some models enjoy posing nude & they aren't being exploited when they get paid to do what they enjoy. I didn't post this lesson to debate morality. I want you to learn something valuable, then profit from it. Fewer Calories Tastes Great Diet Coke has been marketed as a beverage people would drink just for the taste of it. (So, what's your point, Dennis?) People may be sensitive about their weight, even after they slim down. So, they may (& probably should) still be careful about what they eat & drink. If Diet Coke is something anybody will drink just because it tastes good, then there's no negative connotation to drinking it in public. I don’t know how the "just for the taste of it" campaign worked out, but it had the potential of removing stigma. Without a stigma, Diet Coke could be a more popular product. When people are seen drinking it, that's social proof of how acceptable the product is. Justifying Justification This is where it starts to get rough. I'm not trying to justify or condemn the publication or perusal of the magazines I wrote about below. Nor am I promoting them or the web sites. I’ve heard of men "reading" Playboy magazines "because of the articles". I’ve also noticed some articles I'm interested in. There was a series a while back about how American culture formed & progressed. I wanted to read more of the series. I started in the middle of the series. But did I buy that issue because of the culture series? NO! I didn't know about the series until after I bought it. What about the rest of the issues with that series? Here's the embarrassing part. For years, I"ve joked about guys who "read" Playboy magazines because of the articles. It seemed like a farce. Would a guy really buy a magazine with pictures of nude women, just to read the articles? OK, I'll Concede The Point The articles are nice bonuses, but let's be realistic . . . Well? It turns out the pictures can be nice bonuses in addition the series of interesting articles. (I'll still offer to accept the pictures from those who buy Playboy magazines because of the articles.) Playboy articles can be a reason for choosing Playboy instead of competing magazines. But would those articles be a strong enough incentive to buy the magazine without the pictures? Hey, Women! Don't forget about Playgirl & similar magazines. Don't think you're so morally superior if you want pictures of nude men! Those magazines can have good articles too. (No, I'm not offering to accept those pictures. I know somebody who would like them though.) Justification: Some buy the magazines because they're spouses/partners buy the opposite gender equivalent. It isn't worth arguing about. Let's have equality. The lesson here is: people rationalize emotional decisions with "logical" reasons. So, give people rational reasons for what they buy. Each spouse/partner may want a magazine & use any excuse to get it. I'll Buy That People who have rational reasons for buying are more apt to buy often. They'll be less apt to have buyers' remorse. When somebody comments about the purchase, the rational reasons can be used to justify the purchase. So, there's no excuse if you don't help people rationalize purchases (as long as nobody is hurt) & help them buy what they want/need. That's News To Me! Here's an idea & some issues expanding on the magazine formats: Note- I think there are or have been male newscasters in this service/web site (below). 1 - Many adults want to stay abreast, by which I mean, aware of & informed about current issues. I've heard complaints about newscasts being all bad news. People want some good news too. 2 - There are channels, which have (almost) constant newscasts with commercial breaks. If you have access to these channels, you can tune in anytime to get the latest news. 3 - It's getting harder to get & keep advertisers for some web sites. Many people won't pay or are only willing to pay low prices for content in web sites. Coupling these issues with the rationalization of buying certain magazines (described above) may've inspired somebody to start a news service featuring nude (or undressing) newscasters. A membership is required. (I don't know how much it costs.) Some samples can be found in a video web site, but the people stop & walk away without totally disrobing. Apparently, members get the full views & news. Dennis S. Vogel thrivingbusiness@email.com When you understand customers, you can make your marketing, products & services more appealing. When you use the URLs below to get free knowledge resources, you'll learn & understand more marketing strategies & tactics. http://www.lakefield.net~thrivingbusiness http://www.voy.com/31049/ [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| A Matter Of Taste Or Tasteless Controversy? Part 2 | Dennis S. Vogel | 23:25:03 11/01/09 Sun |
|
Forum timezone: GMT-6 VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |