VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123 ]
Subject: Don’t Pitch, Present What’s Best For Prospects


Author:
Dennis S. Vogel
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:25:51 11/04/08 Tue

I responded to a post in Advertising Age - http://adage.com/smallagency/post?article_id=132248&message=Thanks+for+submitting+your+comment%21
Report from Philly: Swing for the Fences and You Will Succeed
How Winning in Sports Rubs Off in the Workplace
Posted by Marc Brownstein

My response-

Don’t Pitch, Present What’s Best For Prospects

I still cringe when I hear "pitch" used when somebody is trying to persuade prospects to buy.

A baseball pitcher throws pitches in ways to prevent batters from being successful. If we want clients to be successful with what we produce, we should play catch.

Delivering "heat in the clutch" doesn't inspire any warm fuzzy feelings in anybody who’s on the receiving end (is the victim) of a pitch.

We want to get to 1st base with prospects, so we can run home with them. If we throw pitches, they're apt to give us the run-around.

We should present orientations to prospects.

Orientations can show prospects what we know about their situations & what we feel they should know.

I know it may be a matter of semantics, but it seems like too many sales people (account executives) have the wrong mentality. They seem to think "It's us against them." Too many times, pitches are used to put prospects in their places.

It’s the mentality of competition, but the competition should only be between agencies, never between prospects/clients & agencies.

It’s the same mentality of the policy, “Put a close on them & shut up. The 1st person to talk loses.”

Nobody should lose a sales presentation/orientation just because s/he has a question or comment. I’ll even tell prospects I won’t work that way. Either we agree to work together & win or we both lose.

If what you offer is what’s best for a prospect, then the prospect loses after a rejection. If what you offer isn’t what’s best for a prospect, why would you offer it? If you offer what’s not best for prospects, then you are pitching.

I’d prefer not to insult any gender, but since I’m a male, I’ll take a chance. Males are stereotypically competitive. So, maybe we should avoid a MEN-tality.

Dennis S. Vogel independent contractor marketing consultant Two Rivers WI

Dennis S. Vogel
Success = the right tactics + strategies multiplied by the right action. Some of that right information is here -
http://www.lakefield.net/~thrivingbusiness/
http://www.voy.com/31049/309.html

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  E-mail address (optional):

Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.