It is still in the definition stage. -- SPEAK UP

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:08:07 10/31/02 Thu
Author: Richard
Author Host/IP: 1Cust112.tnt1.gainesville.fl.da.uu.net / 67.243.7.112
Subject:

It is still in the definition stage.
In reply to: Kafka 's message, "Re: Spending as a percent of GDP" on 14:13:08 10/31/02 Thu

Kafka,

I think you're getting ahead of yourself. Bolagard suggested that some of the problem we have is overspending. One party spends too much creating problems the next person in the White House has to contend with. I don't know if this is true, but one way to look at relative spending is by comparing spending to GDP. Even that may have some pitfalls. We may not be able to draw any conclusions at all. So I can't define "overspending" or if it even creates problems. All I can do is look at spending patterns to see if there is any correlation to things like unemployment, GDP, or income.

Richard

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: It is still in the definition stage. -- Kafka, 17:12:31 11/01/02 Fri