VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:01:46 08/15/03 Fri
Author: Me
Subject: oops Forgot the link! http://www.sitewave.net/news/s49p1354.htm
In reply to: Me 's message, "Hey Magic, I understand your point but, I do my own home work though and usually and I steer clear from believing what certain political party members (with their own political best interests at heart) tells me. Nor do I listen to certain political party members who try to scare me into voting the way they want me to. Here's a link that explains my point a little better. There are some interesting articles there." on 14:57:08 08/15/03 Fri


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> [> Your link is interesting for several reasons - first, it debunks "scientists" - but who the hell is William Robert Johnston? Why should I believe him? Secondly, yes, there are alternative explanations to 'global warming' - but if someone tells you they left the gas on, do you light a match to check? One wears a seatbelt while riding in a car - not because you EXPECT a collision, but in case one happens. We have dumped a tremendous amount of junk in the air - Mr. Johnson only addresses carbon dioxide...*click* -- gumtree (again), 07:18:23 08/19/03 Tue

There's carbon MONoxide (the major pollutant in car exhausts) which is NOT 'recyclable in nature' - that is, trees dont breathe it like they do carbon DIoxide. How about sulfur dioxide? How about unburned fuel?

Its not quite that simple. I would prefer to reduce the level of pollution where we can NOW, than be wishing in the future that I had done something when I could. The 'economic devastation' that Mr. Johnson claims is absurd - think of all the industry DEVELOPED to make the anti-pollution gear (the auto companies dont make catalytic converters, several outside vendors do that).


[ Edit | View ]





[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.