Re: Avalanche -- Council of The Grey

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:14:18 09/11/00 Mon
Author: Brain
Subject: Re: Avalanche
In reply to: avalanche 's message, "Re: Avalanche" on 09:30:11 09/11/00 Mon

> > Now that the quail have been flushed from the
> > underbrush�
> >
> > See, if you just deny everything a person says� If
> you
> > absolutely never agree with any premise whatsoever.
> > Eventually people can see that you really are
> > exhibiting no brain whatsoever. This is just
> > retaliation for retaliation�s sake. It isn�t thought,
> > it certainly isn�t consideration.
>
> excuse me, here you go again making false
> observations.
> i've agreed with plenty of people on these boards, i
> just don't agree with YOU. for very simple reasons. i
> don't agree with you for the same reason i don't agree
> with hitler.
>
>
> >
> > You are completely and utterly inconsiderate, and at
> > least to me show no IQ at all.
>
> then you either aren't smart enough to see what i
> say, or refuse to see it.
>
>
> In fact, you exhibit
> > exactly the worst of the religious standpoint�
>
> and again you misdefine the term "religious". you
> think your definition is the only correct one, when it
> isn't shared by anyone other than yourself.
>
>
> That no
> > question that anybody ever comes up with is worth
> > consideration. That there�s always that pat answer
> > thrown out, and the main purpose is demoralization.
> >
> such is the nature of warfare.
>
>
> > Of course, you forgot a main thing here� I am neither
> > an idiot, nor do I speak crap.
>
> ah, but you most definitely are. but ofcourse you
> can't accept this, because it happens to be you who
> we're talking about. nonetheless, it's most definitely
> true.
>
>
> When a person speaks so
> > much truth, and you respond with WRONG, WRONG, WRONG�
> > Don�t you think that you are the one who is shown to
> > be a complete and utter phoney?
>
> no, not at all. you speak no truth at all. you
> simply believe you do because you're the one saying
> it. but merely claiming to be correct, does not make
> you so. besides, i have done more than just respond
> with "wrong", i have in fact shown exactly WHY you are
> wrong, and you have responded with more of the same
> nonsense. (that being meaningless personal attacks).
> yet you still refuse to see that you are in fact wrong.
>
>
>
> >
> > When a person is secretly out to just destroy others,
> > that�s what they do. You aren�t even secretly out to
> > do that, what you do is right out in front of
> > everybody�s face. All it takes, in life, is to be a
> > fool just a few times and people are smart enough to
> > see right through crapola. Others, and I mean people
> > who exhibit no brain at all might actually be stalled
> > by bullshit like yours. Sometimes it�s because they
> > don�t know how to handle an idiot bully, and
> sometimes
> > it�s because someone is needing to believe something
> > so bad that they are willing to listen to stuff that
> > is so patently false, and sometimes people don�t want
> > to be trampled on (the bully on the corner
> syndrome)..
>
> and if that's what you believe, then again i tell
> you, that you don't have a fucking clue about what was
> put forth.
>
> > But, see, I have had enormous practice with idiot
> > bullies such as those who spout the religious dogmas
> > that cripple our world and since your tactics are no
> > different, and you don�t even TRY to hide your
> > ignorance, then you are an easy quail to flush out.
> >
> what ignorance? we have discussed nothing that
> required any advancement knowledge, and knowledge is
> exactly what ignorance has to do with. since i could
> not anywhere in our discussions have exhibited any
> lack of knowledge, one can hardly call me ignorant.
> and considering you have only resorted to petty
> personal attacks (and are continueing to do so), you
> are showing in fact that i'm not so easy to flush out.
>
>
> > I recognize a religious person when I see them.
> >
> and again you blatantly misdefine the term
> "religious"
>
>
> > By doing what you do all the time, with no evidence
> > of a brain in your head to back your mouth,
>
> i could show you a catscan if you'd like.
>
> you
> > completely and utterly destroy every shred of
> > integrity, or substantiality for anything you might
> > ever say in the future. You do realize that, don�t
> you?
> >
>
> by making blind personal accuasations and attacks,
> you do realize that you're only showing your own
> inferiority when it comes to debate? what you're
> doing, is attacking me on a personal level, even
> though what i have brougth forth, i have shown to be
> true. you blindly believe that you, and only you have
> the truth within you, and that if somebody else says
> something that conflicts with your truth, then ergo,
> it must be false, and that person must be an idiot.
> that is the nature of your person, and since that is
> so, i can hardly get upset if you don't take anything
> i say serious.
>
>
> > You come off as such an idiot because you disagree
> > with EVERYTHING.
>
> which is false, since i've agreed with others, just
> not with you.
>
>
> So, eventually everybody can only
> > come to the conclusion that you HAVE TO BE WRONG MOST
> > OF THE TIME.
>
> or right all of the time. again, here you go off
> with the unsubstantiated personal attacks, truly you
> are showing your true nature now. a hatefull,
> vengefull one. not a loving and caring one.
>
>
> You say you have such an enormous IQ,
> > bragging about it in such a distinct and overbearing
> > way but you show yourself to have the IQ of a lab rat
> > when you disagree with EVERYTHING.
>
> this is ofcourse nonsense. disagreeing with things
> is in fact one of the key factors of intelligence. if
> i see that something is wrong, then i disagree with
> it, and show others why it is wrong, in your case, i
> have done so, i have shown you the problems with what
> you say, and you have done nothing to defend yourself,
> you have only attempted to attack me on a very low
> level. which merely shows me your own frustration with
> the problems of your "truth", and not that i'm some
> sort of "idiot", which is what you're trying to
> accomplish with your petty and shallow personal
> attacks.
>
>
> What a dunce that
> > would take to disagree with everything.
>
> disagreement is essential for intelligence and the
> advancement of the human race. if we all just blindly
> agreed with each other, what good would that do? we
> would become a static society, with no progress
> whatsoever. most geniuses of the past disagreed with
> many things, things that people of that time thought
> was "obviously true", just like you believe now that
> what you say is true.
>
>
> That is just
> > complete ignorance,
>
> actually the statement that it is ignorant, could in
> itself be called ignorant.
>
>
> >
> > What it shows is that you have no consideration for
> > others at all.
>
> which ofcourse has nothing to do with intelligence
> (or lack thereof), but more with the cold calculated
> person that i am, nothing wrong with that. it's a
> survival trait.
>
>
> Nor do you have consideration that you
> > have any point. And, as I said before, I�m sure that
> > you do what you do to others to yourself as well.
>
> you're wrong about that you know.
> if you're sure about that, who knows what else you
> might be wrong about?
>
> That
> > is the real problem. You�re just trying to shut up
> > anything and everything and you�re trying to stop
> > everything you want stopped. You�re just a stupid
> > spoiled brat screaming, holding his fingers in both
> > ears and closing both eyes so he doesn�t have to hear
> > or see anything at all.
>
> excuse me, but that definition would fit you a lot
> better.
> you're the one who refused to deal with all the
> objections and problems with your "truth", and chose
> to rather personally attack me, not deal with the
> problems at hand. all you can do apparantly, is preach
> your nonsense, and when somebody reveals it to be
> nonsense, what do you do? you insult them. that is all
> you can do, and if you don't change, that's all you
> will ever be able to do.
>
> for once, just THINK about what i've written, not just
> blindly insult me again. or make up
> pseudo-psychological bullshit about me (which is
> ofcourse also a type of personal attack)
>
> think before you leap.
>
> and change your state of mind.

Since you Avalanche are "intelectualy� incapable of understanding what he is saying, you spill your BS allover the message board and even �think� that you made any sense at all.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Avalanche -- avalanche, 10:19:10 09/11/00 Mon