Re: Tim Tim Tim -- 49ers Clubhouse Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:30:51 03/18/03 Tue
Author: TIM
Subject: Re: Tim Tim Tim
In reply to: Brian Wiley 's message, "Re: Tim Tim Tim" on 18:34:46 03/17/03 Mon

Brian: All I am saying is that it takes years to judge a draft class and that the atheletes we got in the last draft have a great chance to be one of the best drafts the Niners have had in years. If you judge it as a poor draft because many of the greatest atheletes we drafted were injured and couldn't show their stuff(to the average fan but the coaches know) then you are simply jumping the gun .I am saying about the 2002 draft what the opinion of the team is(and I agree with them) and you are saying what your opinion is because they were injured and didn't show YOU enough in games. In a few years or less you will probably be giving the Niners a b+ or an A for their 2002 draft. If they don't reach their obvious potential then come back and tell me in a few years but until then I am comfident in my(and the teams) assessment.
TIM

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Tim Tim Tim -- TIM, 13:34:34 03/18/03 Tue