VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: gӭը: nancychow@hkpro.com.hk


Author:
gӭը: nancychow@hkpro.com.hk
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08:35:16 10/19/01 Fri

gӭը: nancychow@hkpro.com.hk
obligation that the thing undertaken would,if performed, be a different thing from that contracted for.'Lord Radcliffe.
-Supervening illegality-if a change in the law makes the contract illegal ,it will be frustrated. This most often happens when war is declared.
-Performance made pointless-Krell v Henry60, Herne Steam Boat Co v Hutton61.
11.4.2 Limits to frustrations
-If the frustrating event happens before the contract is entered into, the action will lie in mistake rather than frustration.
-If the contract itself provides for what will happen for a potentially frustrating event, the contract will prevail.E.g. the usual provision in contracts for the sale of a house that the buyer will insure it between contract and conveyance.
-If the frustrating event is one which the parties foresaw, or could have foreseen, the courts will be less likely to apply the doctrine of frustration. This does not apply to the outbreak of war.
-If the frustrating event was the fault of one of the parties, the court will not apply the doctrine: Maritime National Fish Ltd. V Ocean Trawlers Ltd62.
11.4.3Effects of Frustration
The contract is automatically terminated from the moment the frustrating event occured,i.e.the contract is discharged. However, it is not void ab initio,so acts under the contract which happened before the frustrating event can continue to have significance. The common law position was basically to let the loss lie where it fell, but because this led to injustice, the law Reform (Frustrated contracts) Act 1943 was passes to modify the position.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.