Better think in black and white than try to sit on two chairs at the same time. -- Flambers Drugstore Archives

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:49:14 04/25/02 Thu
Author: Todd
Subject: Better think in black and white than try to sit on two chairs at the same time.
In reply to: Peter van der Hoog 's message, "You are so completely one-sided" on 06:53:58 04/24/02 Wed

>I don�t defend terrorists. I do challenge the myth
>that only a few Bedouins lived in Israel when the Jews
>came.

I didn't said that.

You think in black and white. You can't accept
>that maybe Israel did something wrong. It�s no use to
>continue this discussion.

Something wrong were negociations with Arafat. It is like negociations with Hitler.

>You know all the arguments and even more.

It is hard to disagree with them.

>I�ve read it. It�s well written, very well argued.

Yes, and there is nothing to add to it. I strongly recommend you to listen to it.

>There is not even one Arab who can defend his case on
>a level that comes near to this. And then to think
>there are numerous people like Elena Bonner. And then
>to think of all these complaints about Arab
>propaganda.

Those people just don't allow to wash their brains. They see the things clearly.

The Israeli�s are by far the strongest
>party in the conflict. My grandparents defended the
>victims of their time. Palestinians are victims of our
>time.

German people were also victims during WWII. There were a lot of atrocities towards Germans. German women and children were killed too. Does that mean that you should take a side of Germany?

Still I don�t think in black and white. I see
>both sides of the story. But you are so completely
>one-sided, that I need to slant to one side.

Better think in black and white than try to sit on two chairs at the same time. Unscrupulousness is ridiculous.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Yes, I agree, to see both sides is more difficult -- Peter van der Hoog, 03:49:05 04/25/02 Thu
- For the last time -- Todd, 04:38:02 04/25/02 Thu
  - Re: For the last time -- Peter van der Hoog, 05:31:52 04/25/02 Thu
  - Re: For the last time -- Malgorzata, 13:38:25 04/25/02 Thu
    - Interesting opinion -- Todd, 01:32:25 04/26/02 Fri
      - Re: Interesting opinion -- Malgorzata, 14:36:43 04/26/02 Fri