VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:42:33 11/05/03 Wed
Author: Pouncer
Author Host/IP: 198.26.74.99
Subject: Not a stupid question at all.
In reply to: Grim ,_,_) 's message, "Completely OT - Grim's stoopid question of the day." on 11:01:39 11/05/03 Wed

As a non-comics reader (we really need to get Anthony's opinion on this) who's only heard about the many variations on Superman through the comics ages, I think that Smallville represents a variation on a theme. As Buffy viewers we all know about alternate universes - to me, Smallville is an alternate Superman universe. It shares characters and certain situations, but presents a new and unique version of Clark Kent's upbringing. It's one I enjoy, but I understand how you couldn't (cf. my feelings about Hercules and Xena and their relation to Greek myths. Horror isn't too strong a label for my reaction).

What I like about the show (not an exhaustive list):

-The inclusion of Lex Luthor as Clark's friend. Every time I think about their future enmity, I get choked up. The series will play out as a tragedy because of their inevitable rift.
-The growing mythology about Clark's origins, Kryptonite, and Lionel Luthor's manipulation of same.
-The close family relationship between the Kents.

What I Dislike:

-The use of Lana Lang. As a character, she's supposed to be perfect, which is boring. And she is also overused to an astonishing degree. The actress is not good enough to add layers or depths to her portrayal, meaning that my teeth ache during many of her scenes.
-Poor execution - too often the show takes good ideas and squanders them due to lack of attention. The quality of continuity, both plot and character, could be much better.
-Overly simplistic moralizing, although this appears to be abating with the new season.

I thought the end of the second season was poor, but they've started out the third season right. As a viewer, I'm now eager to watch instead of wary, which is the way it should be.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> I can't improve on Pouncer's reply. -- wwolfe, 12:13:07 11/05/03 Wed (161.149.63.110)

I was going to suggest that "Smallville" is to "Superman" as "Rozencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead" is to "Hamlet," but I think Pouncer's explanation of it serving as a parallel universe is more concise and less pretentious.

The one point I might expand on a little is: "too often the show takes good ideas and squanders them due to lack of attention." I agree, and I would suggest that one element that the show tends to lack in its execution is the ability - or possibly even the recognition of the potential - to add layers of meaning and ambiguity through the use of metaphor. This is a fairly central failing in a genre show such as this one. To a large extent, this element manages to be visible through the haze, despite the writers' maladroit use of this device, simply because the premise itself makes it unavoidable. The inability to fully exploit this tool, however, means that the show tends to be one-dimensional, and to exert much less pull on one's imagination after any given episode ends, than did "Buffy."

If "Superman" were of great importance to me - and I can see why it is, for anyone who feels that way - I expect this show would bother me, in the same way that the fatuous portrayal of the Fifties and early Sixties in movies like "Grease" bothers me. But since I have only a fondness for "Superman," rather than a passion, this current variation on the story doesn't bother me.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> I'd like to add... -- wwolfe, 12:16:34 11/05/03 Wed (161.149.63.110)

...that I think a view point like yours, Grim, is a prefectly valid one, and ought to be represented on a panel like the one you'll be on. It's similar to Angharad and me speaking against the prevailing wisdom that "good" music began with the Beatles and Bob Dylan, or that only people who sing their own songs are truly artists.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Thank you, guys. This is a big help. -- Grim ,_,_), 13:43:25 11/07/03 Fri (66.95.229.84)


[ Edit | View ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.