VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:22:53 11/11/00 Sat
Author: Charles Hodges
Subject: Re: TVM #24
In reply to: Chris 's message, "TVM #24" on 13:44:49 11/08/00 Wed

> I still have some confusion on #24. I have the risk
> for #23 based on the equation in Chap 6. On #24, it
> seems to be that the equation in Chap 6 is for a 2
> stock portfolio. Can this be expanded for the
> situtaion in #24.
>
> From class you mentioned using the weighted average
> of the stocks in #23 with the risk calculated in #23
> and that the riskless securities will go to 0. Can
> you explain how this applies to the risk equations in
> Chap 5. I am having trouble calculating the risk for
> #24.

You can also use the equations in chapter 6 for this question.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.