VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:11:44 06/10/02 Mon
Author: Rita
Subject: A Law

Antibiotics

I assumed that everyone knew about the 5-decade-old United States
prescription drug law (CAUTION: Federal law prohibits dispensing without
prescription) affect on Antibiotics. I feel that the law was used to
deprive me the right to my more effective antibiotics, and I used my husband
's Michigan healthcare as an example of antitumor/antiviral antibiotics
being withheld. Thus I would like a law passed enabling me to purchase my
most effective antibiotics (doctors will not prescribe them). I believed
that a law should have been passed 5-decades ago informing the patient
(medical customer) to beware of the evil doctors that would use the drug law
to create a larger business.

I asked God for my best medicine. God said: "Ask your drug prescriber for
Streptomycin."

My doctor/drug prescriber office-call-charge was $45, and I didn
't receive a prescription for the right to go to the drug store to purchase
the antibiotic. I assume that you've heard of the half-century-old United
States prescription drug law: "Caution: Federal law prohibits dispensing
without prescription." I had never seen that law placed on an antibiotic
label until I purchased a bottle of Penicillin-VK in Mexico. I thought that
I was the last person on earth to have heard of that law being placed on
antibiotics. I wasn't looking for that Penicillin, but when the Mexican
pharmacist said, "It's better than nothing." I certainly agreed. I had paid
$169 for a doctor/drug prescriber to write a prescription for Penicillin-VK
note stating that I had the right to go to a pharmacist to purchase
30-hand-counted-tablets of Penicillin-VK for $10.50. The sealed bottle of
100 tablets of Penicillin-VK 500mg (made in the USA) at the cost of $12 was
a bargain.

Then when I compared the $45-drug-prescriber-charge with my husband's
January 2002 drug prescriber appointment, questioning of an additional $45
charge because the cardiologist had charged extra because of the extra time
that the cardiologist/drug prescriber had spent to write Hubby a letter
stating that he (cardiologist) had no control over the medical liars in his
office.

I assumed that the reader would be aware that in 1996 my husband
was Gentamicin Sulfate USP drug over-dosed. That would be 6-years known
that Gentamicin Sulfate recommendation was to be used on a 6-week protocol,
knowing that the drug-of-choice-Gentamicin would drug over-dose halfway
through the recommendation.

Again Hubby lived; as such he did when he was treated for a neck tumor with
blood transfusions until there was enough infection to disintegrate bones.
Antitumor antibiotics were available in 1983, yet the Michigan hematologist
used blood transfusions. After Hubby changed hematologist, he was treated
for a pathogen-produced Hodgkin's disease; years later he was treated for a
pathogen produced colon cancer, and a few years after the noticeable
laboratory produced blood test figure increase he was treated for a
bacterial-produced heart disease (the treatment was known to be deadlier
than the disease). Hubby lived through every blood test lie that could be
told by any and all Michigan medical people. He was even lied to about
antibiotics. At which time I had no problem calling a medical liar a
terrorist throwing poison into the Michigan medical cupboard. Hubby lived
through two bacterial-produced diseases; one was called "the treatment is as
deadly as the disease"; the second was that the treatment was "deadlier than
the disease".

What is a healthcare society? To me in Michigan, it would be
members of the Medical, Psychological, and United States Pharmacopoeia of
which many Michigan doctors were members.

The United States prescription drug law didn't fall from the sky. People
from various healthcare societies presented a law that would enable a larger
medical business.

I wondered what did the United States prescription drug law do?

So I took a good look at the Streptomycin antibiotic (It was
called a glucoside). I noticed that the antibiotic had won the discoverer a
Nobel Prize. In the list of Nobel Prize winners there were only two prizes
given for antibiotics. One was for the activity against gram-positive
bacteria, and it was called Penicillin. The other was for the activity
against gram-negative bacteria, and it was called Streptomycin.

My question became why would one (penicillin) become further
developed, and the other (Streptomycin) development stifled?

So I wandered to the pharmacy, asking, "Would it be legal for me
to mix the streptomycin bacterium with an ointment base and make an ointment
for my personal use?" The reply was yes.

The subject changed to the question about my receiving the streptomycin
bacterium without a prescription, and the reply was "Little to none," while
the pharmacist look was "Please go someplace else for the 'CAUTION: Federal
law prohibits dispensing without prescription' law to be properly recited."

At the Michigan pharmacy, the subject was again changed this time to my trip
to Mexico. Years ago someone suggested that I go to Mexico to look for the
three antibiotics: Adriamycin/Doxorubicin, Penicillin G Benzathine, and
Streptomycin. All three antibiotics used to be available in the United
States, but then further development of them ceased.

What I liked about Penicillin G Benzathine was that it remained
in the blood for at least a week. That meant that I could take one pill a
week for four weeks. I thought that the better the antibiotic the better
reason for its disappearance.

Meanwhile, I explained to the pharmacy that the Mexican pharmacist tried to
sell me a tube of Penicillin ointment, because there was no streptomycin
ointment available. I was annoyed that a gram-positive antibiotic was
offered instead of a gram-negative one. So I left purchasing nothing. I
had wandered into three Mexico drug stores until finally one pharmacist told
me that the items were not available, and what he suggested to purchase was
"Better than nothing!" Then I decided that I should include Bleomycin as
the fourth choice on my antibiotic wish list. If the Michigan politicians
don't pass a law permitting me the right to my most effective antibiotics,
then I would be receiving inferior treatment as such my husband did.

Inferior treatment could be easily identified with matching of the medical
bills with the actual product (medical test) done. Of course, I used my
husband's medical conditions as an example.

In 1996 I had found that matching the medical bill charges with the actual
test was impossible and strongly discouraged because of additional charges
for a copy of the medical tests. The cardiologist told my husband that he
didn't need any of his medical records, especially his blood tests. The
medical joke of the day was "Put a zipper in your patient/medical customer
so that you can take out the bacterial-damage done in the future."

Therefore, I had written many times to many Michigan politicians about
passing a law requiring that a paid-for product be a received product.
Again the subject reverted back to the blood tests lies that had taken place
back in the 1970's and 1980's, and to my husband's 1983 blood transfusions
that were used to treat his neck tumor, knowing that there were antitumor
antibiotics available but not used by the Michigan hematologist.

In August 1983, a Michigan nurse stated that people were known to become
upset when they discovered that through blood tests they were adopted. At
the time, the subject was two-fold; one being that antitumor antibiotics
were being withheld and the other that blood tests were and had been lied
about since the 1970's.

I thought that someone being adopted or that the hospital
mixed-up a few babies was a flimsy excuse to justify the withholding of
antitumor antibiotics or to lie about blood tests.

Again the subject was that no Michigan doctor would step forward to state
that antitumor/antiviral antibiotics were being withheld, and that no
Michigan hematologist would step forward to identify the blood transfusion
antibody called +DAT that had to be used with each transfusion until there
was enough infection to disintegrate bones. In 1983 the Michigan Hodgkin's
disease treatment was called "As deadly as the disease", and by 1996 the
bacterial-infection treatment was called "Deadlier than the disease."

I felt that the Michigan psychiatric society lied when they stated that
withholding antibiotics/tuberculosis vaccine (strand found in humans) has no
affect on the humane natural resources.

So in addition with the Michigan healthcare society removing blood test
standards. Three laws need to be passed:

1) Paid-for medical records be received without the medical customer having
to either beg for or having to pay outrageous amounts of money for every
copy (if the copy is available).

2) A law requiring that when the drug-of-choice such as Gentamicin Sulfate
USP was/is used on the Michigan healthcare society recommended 6-week
protocol, knowing that it would drug over-dose halfway through the
recommendation be immediately known to the public, instead of waiting
decades before informing the public.

3) A law enabling me to receive my most effective antibiotics/medicines.
Apparently I'm the only person in Michigan complaining about the withholding
of antitumor/antiviral antibiotics and the 3-decades of deliberate blood
tests misinformation.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.