VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]456 ]
Subject: Re: 捉字虱


Author:
無聊人二號
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08:59:56 09/25/01 Tue
In reply to: 玩下,鍾意就玩,唔鍾意就算 's message, "Re: 為何以淺白作為評核標準?" on 07:05:34 09/25/01 Tue

咦又話淺白不一定是「好」,但又以"細路仔問橙色「靚」定綠色「靚」作比較,有矛盾喎。

既然爭論點為私人原因,拿來公決一點意義都沒有。
不是批評,不過覺得摸不著頭腦。



>>為何鬥"淺白"呢?淺白就是好嗎?勝了又如何?
>>這種二分法很幼稚嘛。
>
>1.爭論點是「淺白」是因為私人原因。
>2.沒人說過淺白就是好。
>3.勝了也沒什麼,難道二人還會因此自大起來「我好淺白啊我?>n淺白啊」?
>4.澄清了以上三點,不知還有沒有所謂的二分法存在。
>
>這位朋友,如果你看過這兩人的詩不妨評論,這只是路邊兩個?>鬗薊漱p孩捉住你問「你覺得橙色靚定係綠色靚?」如果你覺得
>無聊可以不理,如果你覺得答下小朋友亦無妨就答。淨係咁o者
>。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
我修正我修正不過討論的重點並不是這個15:32:37 09/25/01 Tue


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.