VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]56 ]
Subject: 就地理學來說, 風化並不是這個意思


Author:
用詞
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:56:52 07/15/01 Sun
In reply to: somebody 's message, "貼詩" on 11:58:11 07/15/01 Sun

頭一句比較直接
到第二句的最後一個字就始"來料"
"再造/造成"的斷句尤見心思
不過用詞("風化")未達準確
可惜


>[ SOMEBODY ] 給kong
>
>
>
>已經過了很久,暈眩早已過去,我們喝掉過多啤酒,遺下過多?>~子了
>無人願意回收,聽說已經風化就無法循環再造
>成任何物事,任何人。
>
>0258 20010716

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
請問風化的準確定義是什麼呢?[nt]地下情07:21:13 07/16/01 Mon


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.