VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:44:55 06/29/02 Sat
Author: Manuel
Subject: Thank you Potter
In reply to: Potter 's message, "Re: For potter" on 05:35:07 06/29/02 Sat

I have problems when i compile with MPASM.
What version do you uses? and options

Can i study the data packet information with a scope 10Mhz?

There are tools in the internet for study the data packet information ?



I have NTSC system THANK YOU MASTER¡





>Not sure what the difference is between those 2 code
>versions but it sounds like it is in the way it
>detects the edges or at least the polarity
>(rising/falling) - carefully compare the lockon,
>makevbi and makehline routines and you may find a clue
>and I guess it's a fairly simple modification required.
>Giln18 is for mode change packets on line 18 (NTSC)
>can you see this on a cro?
>If you have variable burst attenuation you will need
>to use the data packet information to 'fix' it.
>
>My system is PAL B/G 50Hz and I had to write my own
>code to deal with it but 'borrowed' techniques from
>all the code versions I could study.
>
>
>>All channels have sync pulse suppressed and not
>>inverted, with the code rev7a all channels works very
>>good.
>>With rev7t1a some channels its very hard to lock.
>>
>>Which is the difference between rev7a and rev7t1a
>>about sensitivity of the edge detectors?.
>>
>>ANOTHER QUESTION POTTER
>>
>>In my system the sync pulse and the burts is attenuate
>>in two levels. dont have random video inverted, and
>>audio is clear. The original descramblers are JERROLD.
>>Is this system for the code giln18?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.