VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:55:07 08/01/02 Thu
Author: SAK-47
Author Host/IP: 204.211.39.160
Subject: you don't get it WOGGIE
In reply to: WOG 's message, "No SAK I asked her if she agreed" on 12:55:45 08/01/02 Thu

Your C&P post to dori on "essential doctrine" was stimulated by my questions to her yesterday:

Date Posted: 15:39:42 07/31/02 Wed
Author: SAK-47
Author Host/IP: 152.31.32.65
Subject: lets see about YOU, dorki
In reply to: dori 's message, "Great Job of Spamming SAK" on 15:39:42 07/31/02 Wed

Like I said, Mondo, Sola and I were having a good discussion concerning "essential doctrine" a couple of days ago, and it's relationship to "heresy".

Please show us your acumen and state your understanding of what constitutes "essential doctrine" and state what relationship "essential doctrine" has with "heresy".

dori makes assertions and throws out some buzzwords she has picked up here and there to superficially appear to be saying something smart, but doesn't have a clue as to what she is saying 99% of the time. When she is questioned, or asked to explain or support her assertions with a defensible argument, she dodges, and takes the tactic of trying to turn a discussion into an argument of a personal nature to divert attention from the issue. We have seen her operate in that fashion for a couple of years.

She makes bold claims but can't back any up.

She accuses others of not having substance, when in reality it is dori who is lacking in substance.

The more you question her(she hates to be "questioned") the madder she gets, and the more confused and convaluted her answers become until she totally loses it and begins with her stupid, petty, snippiness as a cover for her ignorance.

My questions to her yesterday, and posted above, were to engage dori in an actual discussion of substance, to see if her claims of wanting to discuss Biblical, spiritual matters is true or bogus. And, true to form, she avoided that discussion, and waited until you gave a "definition" of "essential doctrine" that she could respond to, instead of responding to the request that she give HER definition of "essential doctrine" and the "relationship" between "essential doctrine" and "heresy", which she can't do, because she doesn't have a clue.

doris bluffs and tries to BS her way through things, and gets terribly offended when her BS bluff is called.

Keep on asking her to explain what she means, or to define her terms or support her buzzword assertions and yule see what I mean.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.