No squeak God's Word determines correct doctrine -- The Word Was God

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:05:40 07/05/02 Fri
Author: SAK-47
Author Host/IP: 152.31.32.65
Subject: No squeak God's Word determines correct doctrine
In reply to: squeak 's message, "You say:" on 09:32:19 07/04/02 Thu

Those who correctly identify JWs are deceived by false doctrine are in agreement with correct doctrine as taught in the Scriptures.

Those who teach and preach false doctrines such as the JWs are in opposition to the Word of God, and seeking to suppress the truth in unrighteousness.

It's not so much that we disagree with the JWs, but that we agree with Scripture and they don't. Instead they twist and pervert the clear teachings of Scripture to their own destruction, and try to lead people into hell through doctrines of demons.

By denying that Jesus IS God, they are denying the person of Jesus Himself, and believe the lie of Satan who seeks to keep them in bondage by perverting the Nature of Christ.

I would suggest that you study God's Word instead of relying on emotionalism, and politically correct religion.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]