VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01/13/03 9:49am
Author: Peter
Author Host/IP: 198.81.26.205
Subject: Re: Could Depth be overrated?
In reply to: BudMan 's message, "Could Depth be overrated?" on 01/12/03 7:25am

I have never been infavor of playing more than 8 or 9 guys.
After that you begin to loose continuity with your starters and familarity playing with the same guys.

Have your 5 starters and 3 subs to give the starters a blow, 2 minutes at a time, max.

Maybe it's time to start Johnson at center and move Dennis to a forward position......Shilling to shooting guard, Allen point and Kamara forward.

Out.


>There were five conference games yesterday. In three
>of them, the winner played 9 guys or fewer. This
>includes Idaho who played 9 men (one made only a token
>appearance or it would have been 8). Cal St Fullerton
>and UoP both played 8 players and won.
>
>Meanwhile, teams like Cal Poly are shuffling guys in
>and out in an attempt to keep fresh bodies on the
>floor, to give the opposition a different look, etc.
>and we lose. This is not a conference known for up
>tempo styles. Perhaps teams can have success with a
>short bench in the BWC. Utah St seems to use its
>depth effectively, but many teams in this conference
>haven't apparently figured out how to take advantage
>of some of the shorter benches.
>
>One of Poly's strengths this year is we finally go 10+
>deep with real D1 players. I'm not suggesting that we
>move to the Jeff Schneider school of transition
>offense with a very breakable press, but maybe we need
>to mix more traps in and look to push the ball up the
>court at opportune times. Also, with fresh legs
>coming off the bench, we should be getting more than
>two dozen boards a game. Varnie's doing his part
>(which seems to be taking him out of his offensive
>flow), but it'd be nice if we could count on Phil,
>Jared, and Vlade to pull down 5 a piece and Kamara to
>get close to 10 every night. Also, our guards and
>small forwards are apparently not hitting the
>glass--we need 3-4 a piece from each of those
>positions every night too.
>
>I realize Utah St and Poly both shot the lights out
>Thursday, so there weren't alot of boards to get, but
>what was the reason last night??
>
>Does coach give out awards for assists. When the
>guards aren't shooting well, how about working on
>assists a la Mark Campbell who dished out 8 last night?
>
>On the positive side, Bromley's more controlled tempo
>is helping us to not give up easy buckets off of
>turnovers.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.