VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06/20/03 8:09pm
Author: Peter
Author Host/IP: 198.81.26.143
Subject: Re: new football conference
In reply to: Seth Buford 's message, "new football conference" on 06/20/03 5:08pm

Some QUESTIONS;

1. What is the current climate regarding Sac. State joining this new conference as well as the BWC?

2. Same question for San Jose State? I know it will be a hard pill to swallow....

With Sac. State & SJS you have a nice nine team football conference.

Go POLY!!!!


>Poly eyes possible move to new football conference
>By Chris Giovannetti
>The Tribune
>
>Cal Poly is one of seven universities examining the
>creation of a new football conference.
>
>The proposed conference would not only solidify the
>Mustangs' scheduling but possibly lead to an automatic
>playoff berth.
>
>Besides Cal Poly, the proposed conference could
>include UC Davis, St. Mary's, Southern Utah, Northern
>Colorado, North Dakota State and South Dakota State.
>
>"We're not sure of the time line but it's still an
>intriguing possibility," Mustangs head football coach
>Rich Ellerson said.
>
>Since the four-team America West Conference disbanded
>in 1995, the Cal Poly football team has played as a
>Division I-AA independent.
>
>The proposed conference, which doesn't currently have
>a name, would feature three teams -- St. Mary's, UC
>Davis and Southern Utah -- that Cal Poly regularly
>plays. Plus, Northern Colorado is scheduled for a
>future season.
>
>"We'd love to have a conference, it's something we
>dream about," Ellerson said. "We'd have a part of our
>schedule automatically filled.
>
>"We already have a rivalry with Davis and this adds
>fuel to the fire."
>
>If the conference can secure at least six teams, the
>annual conference winner would receive an automatic
>I-AA playoff bid. That playoff berth, Ellerson
>believes, would be available in the league's third
>season.
>
>To get the conference proposal rolling, Northern
>Colorado athletic director Jim Fallis believes three
>objectives must be reached in the near future:
>
>• A scheduling alliance. Prospective schools should
>set aside an eight-week period toward the end of the
>season for games against the six other schools. "It's
>something for a long-term basis," Fallis said.
>
>• A centralized office with a representative. Fallis
>isn't calling for a commissioner, merely someone to
>channel between the schools and the NCAA.
>
>• Communication. "Conference calls, meetings," Fallis
>said. "We need to figure out where we go every step of
>the way."
>
>While those items could speed up the process, Ellerson
>is wary of rushing into a new conference.
>
>"We need to look at what the landscape in college
>football will be two years from now," he said.
>
>Ellerson pointed out that several current Division I-A
>football programs, including San Jose State, could
>fall back to Division I-AA if they don't meet certain
>standards in the coming years. Averaging 15,000 fans
>per game against five Division I-A schools are among
>new rules that have been implemented.
>
>"A lot of questions need to be asked and answered and
>some of those we can't get to right now," Ellerson
>said.
>
>Ellerson wasn't sure what Cal Poly's next move would
>be and Cal Poly athletic director John McCutcheon, out
>of the office until next week, could not be reached
>for comment.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.