VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03/11/03 9:33am
Author: Stangman
Author Host/IP: 66.17.48.78
Subject: Re: Loss to CSUF. . .a good thing?
In reply to: BudManPoly 's message, "Loss to CSUF. . .a good thing?" on 03/ 9/03 8:29am

>I think the Mustangs have, justifiably so, a great
>deal of confidence heading into Thursday's match up
>with Idaho. However, as Varnie mentioned, Idaho is
>the team the 'Stangs were least anxious to meet. We
>won five in a row on the road before dropping last
>night's contest to Fullerton. Because of our lack of
>success against Idaho this year, I don't think the
>Mustangs were feeling OVERconfident, but in case they
>were, the Fullerton loss brought them back down to
>earth. The loss shouldn't have demoralized the team
>though--because we were in position to win at the end,
>having fought back after a horrible first half.
>
>Bottom line, I think the team likely has the right mix
>of apprehension/respect and confidence to perform well
>enough to beat the Vandals.
>
>If we mix up the defenses (tossing in some of the
>newly instituted zone) I think we have a good shot at
>advancing to the second round. While we may be an
>underdog against the Vandals and possibly in all three
>rounds, I think we could win the tournament.
>
>After Shane's 32 point performance last night, I don't
>think Idaho will develop a special defense to slow him
>down, but Shane is a wildcard that could draw defenses
>out of the paint. Shane has the most points in a
>single game in conference this year (32) and he has
>the most rebounds in a game in conference this year
>(17). The problem is, he is as likely to score 20+ as
>he is to score 6 or 8. If he comes to play, he can
>present problems for anyone--especially when our
>guards are hitting their shots too. This team has
>shown late in the season that it can stop or at least
>slow scorers (Nate Carter/Ralphy Holmes/Tony Darden).
>I like their heart defensively. This, in my opinion,
>is the biggest difference from years past.
>
>Play loose, play tough defense, hit the glass, play
>with confidence--and I think we can win Thursday.


Great post Budman, my sentiments exactly. I would only add that we have to hold our TO's down to around 12 or less. I just knew Schilling was set to go off on a tangent sooner or later. We could use a couple more in the coming week. Didn't someone say it is really hard for a team to win three games straight against the same opponent? Ask ucsb.

Go Mustangs.......

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.