Re: "Garbage" Peter ? -- World Conspiracies

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, October 22, 01:46:47pm EDT [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:47:11 10/05/01 Fri
Author: bdoc
Subject: Re: "Garbage" Peter ?
In reply to: Don Barone 's message, ""Garbage" Peter ?" on 09:38:20 10/05/01 Fri

Peter do you believe that Nasa have been involved in hiding anything? Hoagland points out quite correctly that their record in relation to their mission statement, about being an open and sharing organisation is questionable at least, criminal at most. Whenever the original picture from Viking came to our attention Nasa almost immediately said they had a second confirming picture that proved betond a doubt that the image was the result of some pretty coincidential shadowing. They waiting nearly 30 years before they admitted that this was not the case. Since the early pictures there has been some seriously dodgy altering of images to fit with their public utterances. I think this question needs to be answered beyond a doubt so far it hasnt, and that question is, was someone on Mars at some point in the past, given the humanoid nature of the face were we on Mars at some long forgotten time in our past? Hoagland has at time undoubtely let himself be distracted by the personal abuse he and his organisation has had to endure and this sometimes leaves him isolated but in reality I can see no reason why he would have devoted so much of his life and time to perpetuating a lie about Mars.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]