Author:
AB Randy Kemp
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 10:02:03 01/09/04 Fri
Hello Mark:
Here's some other feedback I got from another Christian friend.
Randy
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello Randy,
I'm not sure if I've ever commented on this subject here before but I think
arguing with a sceptic or atheist is hopeless. Even when you point out to
them that their position is in itself a leap of faith they will be either
clueless or deny it outright.
The sceptic could say there is no philosophical or moral truth. Period. The
thoroughgoing sceptic could say that we create all meaning, that's it's all
mind-dependent.
Atheism is a complicated mind set. Atheists are usually dogmatists for a
variety of reasons stemming from the problem of bad things happening to
good people or the inability to see beyond appearances.
Some people, either from environmental factors, family upbringing, or
genetic predisposition, are unable to relate to anything metaphorical,
allegorical, symbolic or transcendental. The atheist is often somewhere
outside this range of this kind of awareness. Cf. the positivists of the
early twentieth century.
But for what I would call the artistic atheist, who seems to have some
sense of the above, there is the dogmatic denial that some all-powerful,
all-good, supreme being would allow such nasty things to happen to good
people. Explanations of theodicy fall flat.
There is a popular talk-show host in the Bay Area who is fond of saying,
"The question of God is unimportant..." For him, the existence or
non-existence of God makes no difference one way or the other; it doesn't
change anything. This is probably the most disbelieving statement I've ever
heard anyone make. You would think whatever would settle the question of
ultimate truth or the meaning of life would be an important question - but
not to this man. I have years of graduate study behind me and I simply am
speechless in the face of such an attitude.
Daniel
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
|