VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]45 ]
Subject: Re: RE:矛盾


Author:
矛盾
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 07:20:34 12/16/01 Sun
In reply to: 臥底 's message, "RE:矛盾" on 05:27:47 12/16/01 Sun

你用比喻用得唔係咁好wor。
我話A implies B
你就用P implies Q 唔等於 Q implies P做比喻,有o的語無倫次之感。
情形就好似我話「x^2 = 4, then x = 2 or -2」,而你就話我錯,你o既原因係「1+1等於2,唔代表2一定係等於1+1」。
呢o的係中六pure maths學番黎o既,明唔明都好啦,爭拗就此完結吧,費事將事情越搞越複雜。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.