Re: 關sir授課之紀律問題 -- SFXC center

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5 ]

Subject: Re: 關sir授課之紀律問題

Author:
一位家長

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:19:20 11/22/01 Thu
In reply to: -3D- 's message, "關sir授課之紀律問題" on 07:24:05 11/22/01 Thu

雖然我的兒子未曾上過關sir(又或人稱關伯)的課,但他亦和我討論過好幾次別班同學上這位老師的課時的紀律問題。我相信各位老師是不好又或不方便去評論別位同事的,就請容我表達一下我在這件事上的看法:

我相信關SIR並不是如同學所認為的這麼差勁,不然他怎樣在濟記酖這麼多年呢?,但大家在開始上他的課之前,一早已從其他途徑聽聞他的人與事,心中已為關SIR定了一個IMAGE,到真正上他的課時,從沒有考慮過接納他,大家都採取一個抗拒的態度,請大家想想,這樣對他又是否公平呢?

究或他的教學方法可能真的有點過時,但大家有否從另一個角度去看,他所積纍的教學經驗和文學修為,是不是真的一無是處,全無可取呢?

退一步說,以我所理解,關sir將屆退休之年,對各位同學來說,他已然是一個老先生,各同學又可否像尊重其他長輩一樣的尊重他呢?

如果從自私的角度去看,同學們上課時肆意妄為(說實在的,對於同學們在班上的所作所為,作為家長,我覺得不能接受,可能我也已經out了!),大家可能很享受一時的刺激,但對大家又會有甚麼好處呢?招致受罰,在自己的成績表上記上一個缺點,吃虧的可又是同學自己。

同學們,如果您們認為為了一個大家都不認同的老師,大家甘願去賠上自己的時間和學業成績,我無話可說。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: 關sir授課之紀律問題 (Correction)	一位家長	18:28:27 11/22/01 Thu
Re: 關sir授課之紀律問題 (Correction) -- 受害人, 05:28:37 12/07/01 Fri