Re: May ring a bell...may not -- Margaritaville NFL Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:33:01 04/28/15 Tue
Author: Niner
Author Host/IP: 71.135.168.178
Subject: Re: May ring a bell...may not
In reply to: C-Hawk Watcher 's message, "May ring a bell...may not" on 19:06:26 04/27/15 Mon

>This was years ago but the gist of it is that gg was
>posting stuff with the usual name calling. I was
>posting right back using the exact same names with
>facts.
>
>The back and forth went on for a while when you came
>in and said that I had to stop. Not WE, but I, even
>though there was no breach of rules by either of us
>that I could see and if there was..it was being done
>be both since I was posting the exact same types of
>posts with the exact same name calling.
>
>You said that it was your board and if I didn�t like
>it I was free to leave and if I continued, I�d be
>suspended and one more instance, I�d be banned.
>
>When I asked why since we were BOTH doing the same
>thing you replied something to the effect of �not even
>close� (even though as I stated�it was the EXACT SAME
>LANGUAGE)
>
>When I asked to take it off-line you said something to
>the effect of me being delusional.
>
>So, like I said�blatant duplicity.
>
>If rules were being broken, they were being broken by
>both. If not, then they weren�t being broken by
>either (and I don�t think the rules were being broken
>by either).
>
>It was BS to call out only one of us for the exact
>same material.
>
>And you were right, I was free to leave and I did.
>
>You ran off a FOG�a member from way back because of
>your double standards.

Doesn't ring a bell with me but I do remember where all the complaints came from. The same people who won't join a new board because there is a forum to speak. The same people who won't show up because they know that they lose big when facts are allowed to be brought forth. Those use to a liberal media shielding them from facts that they can't refute.

The reason for the sub boards is that you don't have to visit if it makes you uncomfortable.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]