VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:34:05 07/04/00 Tue
Author: Jerome
Subject: Re: Player re-signings
In reply to: Em 's message, "Player re-signings" on 20:20:53 07/04/00 Tue

> Along with McLeod, a few more players have been
> re-signed, and haven't 'resigned' lol...

Sorry for that typo evryone! At least you're all paying attention.

> Marsh for a 'multi-year' term
> Smart - 1 year

Good stuff!
> Gallagher, Burton, Perrie and McGregor all 2 or 3 years

I think Stenglien has also re-signed for a 2 year deal. Not much trade bait available for the end of year draft huh?

> The article on the AFL website also said Robran, Rehn
> and Eccles still have to agree to contracts...I wonder
> if Eccles will stay after what Sarah's been saying.
> Also, they won't make a decision on Jarman's contract
> till the end of the year, depending on his fitness.

Robran's form has pretty much won him a one year contract at the most. Good on him. Rehn will continue with the AFC for sure, Eccles however...

> And a few players won't be offered contracts -
> probably Ellen, Shirley, Bond and Ormond-Allen (oh
> no!! Trent!! Your fave, Sarah??)

Thank Christ they are getting rid of Trent! Why have we hung onto that bloke for so long? It's certainly not for his looks! I feel sorry for Bondy!

They better not get rid of Matt Shir...grrr if
> they do.

Agreed bluecrow.



Jerome

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.