VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6 ]
Subject: Re: CENTIPEDE PHOTO


Author:
Joey
Author Host/IP: 4.245.125.191
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 05:18:57 05/21/05 Sat
In reply to: Bad Frank 's message, "CENTIPEDE PHOTO" on 07:23:42 05/19/05 Thu

>>>>>>>>>>Centipede graces the cover of the
>>>>October-November
>>>>>>>>>>1955 issue. Vol.3 , No.5
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What publication are you referring to? Does it
>>>>use
>>>>>>>>>the same picture of Centipede that Stratton
>used
>>>>>for
>>>>>>>>>his article? I'd love to see something new on
>>>>>>>>>Centipede. Got something to share?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>NOT IN MANY YEARS HAS ANYONE CONTINUED TO BREED
>>>>>>>>ACCORDING TO THE BREEDING COMPOSITION THAT
>>>PRODUCED
>>>>>>>>CENTIPEDE AND WILLIAM'S RED [8XW] A INBRED SON.
>>>>>THERE
>>>>>>>>IS NO NEW PICTURES OR INFORMATION ON THAT
>>>>PARTICULAR
>>>>>>>>DOG BECAUSE IT WAS NOT PROMOTED AMONG LATER
>>>>>BREEDERS.
>>>>>>>>THANKS TO THE FAST LANE BREEDING CONCEPT, WHAT
>IS
>>>>>>>>LOOKED FOR IN PIT BULLS TODAY IS NOT WHAT MADE
>>THE
>>>>>>>>GREAT DOGS OF THE PASS. ALL WE CAN DO IS RE-READ
>>>>>WHAT
>>>>>>>>HAS BEEN IN PRINT FOR MANY YEARS. THERE IS ONLY
>>>ONE
>>>>>>>>PICTURE OF CENTIPEDE AND NO CURRENT DAY PROGENY
>>>>FROM
>>>>>>>>"THE GREAT ONE". ALL WHO KNEW THAT DOG UP CLOSE
>>>ARE
>>>>>>>>DEAD. WORD OF MOUTH INFORMATION ON ANY OF OUR
>>DOGS
>>>>>IS
>>>>>>>>MERELY HERESAY UNLESS YOU WERE THERE.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>JOEY
>>>>>>>>COLBY BLOODLIN
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>theres more then one photo of Centipede i have 4
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>doubt that seriously. reproductions don't count
>and
>>>>>>are not accurate
>>>>>
>>>>>WHAT ? you mean to tell me you seen or have the
>>>>>"original" photo of Centipede ? there is more than
>>>one
>>>>>photo of Centipede. if they are originals or not is
>>>an
>>>>>entirely different subject. i would post the
>article
>>>>>that appears in your friend and mine as i stated
>>>>>before with Centipede's photo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ok, lets see it. I have my doubts and have seen poor
>>>>duplicates and cover ups that were not FC.
>>>
>>>see for yourself "PIT DOGS"(as we like them). Volume
>>>1 ,No.2 .September 15,1952 . page 4. with very top
>>>center photo the caption under the photo states "This
>>>is Mr. W.E."Red" Howell and the gent on the table is
>>>the one and only Centipede." im looking at it with my
>>>own two eyes at this very moment. so i ask you, is it
>>>possible that this is a "poor duplicate" or "cover
>up"
>>>BTW the "Pit Dogs" mag is an original.
>>
>>
>>Ok. You got a picture. So what? Unfortunately, no one
>>is breeding that type of game individual any longer.
>>The standard set for those type of dogs is long gone.
>>Thanks for the info.
>>
>>Joey
>>Colby Bloodlines
>
>werent we talking about the photo of "Centipede" ? and
>not , who is breeding what ? and to what standards ? i
>told you where to look for the photo. aside from
>inadvertantly calling myself and others liars you
>havent really added anything to the post.other than
>just doubt everything anyone wrote about the subject.
>we as students of the breed try to pass informatinon
>to each other to learn more even if the information is
>old, one must weed through it and make up his mind as
>to what is true or not.BTW how do you know what the
>"standard" was back then ? and how do you know that
>same "Standard" (without knowing what it was) is long
>gone ? how do you know for sure if in fact Centipede
>was even "game" ? how do you know that he was really
>the caliber of dog everyone claimed ? how do you know
>what Centipede really produced ? how do you know of
>Centipede other than reading about him ? you were not
>there, so you dont know for sure. and you were not
>there to know exactly to what standards they were
>breeding him or what standards produced him ? while it
>is common knowledge that Centipede was a great dog you
>were not there to be able to speak on it. so it brings
>me back to your doubts about the photos none of us
>claim to have been there when the photo was taken we
>were simply stating what is written, we did not write
>what is written about him. nor were we there .


Yeah. Thats a fundamental fact. Enjoy your photo.

Joey
Hemphill / Colby

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.