VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6 ]
Subject: Re: Family Breeding Developed


Author:
FigTreeJohn
Author Host/IP: 207.200.116.132
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 20:42:18 02/17/06 Fri
In reply to: Mike Norrod 's message, "Re: Family Breeding Developed" on 08:38:58 02/15/06 Wed

>>>Well since you are not posting as Jake Wilder and now
>>>using your regular handle and not the many you used
>>>like on pedigrees-online I can address it person to
>>>person John.
>>
>>**** Oh really now?
>
>Yes, as you knew I wasn't on Pedigree online to
>respond to your posts. Or here for awhile but now I
>can...

***** Didn't know that.
>
>>>Unless you did the breeding you don't know how a dog
>>>is truly bred. I know of people who had their female
>>>covered by another dog and wasn't aware of it and
>they
>>>had control of the female!
>>
>>**** I agree. But it don't happen in my breeding and
>>won't. I breed in my own yard to my own stock, no
>>help, no stud fee, no shipping or going across the
>>street.
>
>Okay but lets stick to what you first said about
>starting with the dogs you think are truly bred that
>way.

***** No maybe about it or wishful thinking. Over the years I have developed proper contacts to ensure I get what I want.
This is what I was responding too. I agree, I
>never let my female leave my sight. I know a female
>can take be more then one male and have two different
>litters inside her.
>Often in the pass I had people try to create doubt
>about a litter I had. Maximilian and Gr. Ch. Joey
>breeding for example. You wouldn't believe how many
>people tried to create doubt but I knew for fact
>because I never left my female. I knew without any
>doubts because until the female came out of heat, he
>never left my sight. I also took pictures or video
>recorded it.
>
>>>So you think starting a family of dogs is done this
>>>way?
>>
>>**** Buy a star bitch from a star family and breed to
>>the best stud you can find, no matter the expense. Do
>>this with a long standing person of honesty and proven
>>reputation in all dealings [rare find]. Selection /
>>Elimination.
>
>But until you have raised and culled the whole litter
>and provide them, you are still going on another
>person word as far as breeding even if you saw the
>female prove herself and hopefully before you breed to
>that star stud you watch him prove himself.
>
>As far as a star goes,
>it only is, if you see it when it is shining!

Thats true, when you first begin a breeding goal. I have my dogs in place to continue a honest well thought out breeding program that will take a few years to say the least.
>
>>>First off, not knowing for sure but only believing
>the
>>>dogs which are bred are truly bred that way, you
>>>should have kept all 10!
>>
>>**** I did.
>
>I stand corrected. I thought you said you farmed out
>only 6. So I must assume now you kept the other 4?

***** 4 are with me, 6 are in-house [very close family]
>
>
>>>Culled the dogs for whatever purpose you bred them
>for
>>>then improve on the quality if need be.
>>
>>**** I agree and doing that.
>>
>>>If not, go out prove the line of dogs in the field
>for
>>>which the purpose they were bred for!
>>
>>**** Certainly an option.
>
>No, never an option, it is a fact. You truly can't
>expect to produce top quality dogs and they never were
>proven for the purpose they were bred for!

***** Thats true, but still an option.
>
>>>After 4 or 5 generations of proving top quality dogs
>>>in their field for which they are bred for, then you
>>>have a proven bloodline.
>>
>>**** Sometimes.
>
>Well how can they not be???? They are proven dogs!
>From a line of dogs you bred.
>All the rest is just talk and hype and wishful
>thinking.

***** Ratio of success v failure
>
>>>Not living and selling off what others have done to
>>>bring the dogs which a person owns to the point for
>>>which they are claiming the elite.
>>
>>**** I may be many things to many folks, but not the
>>above.
>
>Why do you think this was solely direct to you, that
>you did this?

***** Because you are talking to me?

If the shoe fits or maybe in the back of
>your mind it might?

***** Not my size and no room in back of my mind for that idea.

>But since we are on that subject, one could make the
>argument of your association OFBA and your pass posts.

***** OFBA is not an argument for me. I still have a nice number of dogs bred down off COPPERHEAD via WILDER'S RED SATAN. I am using them for a purpose. My pass post could be confusing. Its better to talk with me.


>
>I.M.

FigTreeJohn

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Family Breeding DevelopedMike Norrod
(67.177.152.140)
13:35:40 02/19/06 Sun


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.