VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8] ]
Subject: Get to this later,im opening a new thread which is part 2 of this post,


Author:
PAUL (no new text)
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:10:30 04/07/02 Sun
In reply to: Rufus 's message, "Re: Ignorance is bliss.......?" on 13:43:37 04/07/02 Sun

>.....would you say the ones who crashed planes
>>into the WTC where right,or the christians who
>>murderedmillions in the crusades? Obviously not!
>
> Paul, I thought what we were talking about was
>the idea that people do this.....and perhaps explore
>"why" they do this. Where is "religion's" role in all
>of this? What if Muslim's interpret their canon to
>include ideas and concepts that, in their 'belief',
>make these actions 'right'? (p.s. this is what these
>people have done).
> The issue becomes: why is your belief any more
>correct than their's? This is what I believe we were
>talking about. If you thought otherwise, can we talk
>about this?
>
>
>>Numbers in a religion dont make it right,truth in a
>>religion does.
>
> Yes, see here: you state that truth in religion
>matters. How does anyone know what this "truth" is,
>Paul? It astounds me that you go on to post (below)
>that man created religion and determining truth is
>"harder". Then you state the above comment and think
>your belief to be logical?
>
>
>>As for Quittner having a christian
>>source which says otherwise,So what,the only christian
>>source iminterested in is the bible.
>
> But it took "man" over 1000 years to write this
>resource you refer to. It has many authors; it has
>been translated from different langauges; it is
>"passed" and "published" by theists with an obvioius
>bias: not to mention the evolution of this bias over
>the years and subsequent publications. And even you
>state that interpreting it is difficult. But it is the
>"ONE" resource you use to determine what is right and
>wrong? This clearly defies all logic and reason.
>
>
>>I am quite aware of the implications of Jesus'
>>words but if you have a problem with that take it out
>>with him.
>
> Would you be so kind as to direct me to Him?
>You're the one whom states you know His words are
>"truth": this imples that you can answer questions
>pertaining to Him: does it not? If yu know His words
>are the true one's, why are you directing me to Him?
> Use His words and answer the question. My point:
>there are various interpretations to any comination of
>words. There are even more possibilities when words
>are translated from one language to another....over
>1000 years, by various people. This concept is what I
>was referring to.
>
>
>>So your opinionated and blunt,good so am I,
>>only when I show that you call me ignorant,funny that
>>isnt it.
>
> No, it is not funny. Ignorance is stating an
>opinion and failing to back it up with evidence. Need
>an analogy?.......I will now make up a God and ask you
>to believe in Her. This God will speak to me and ask
>me to write a new canon to be used in order to benefit
>all of mankind.....a Utopia will follow. All who do
>not follow Her words will cease to exist.
>
> Do you believe in my God, Paul? Or do you
>require some proof? You cannot use your bible and
>declare Her a false prophet; this will cause you to
>cease to exist. She is that powerful, by the way. Is
>it logical to assume that you would just believe my
>words without proof?
>Yet you believe in the words of a book which origins'
>you are not aware of and cannot prove.
> What I am saying is that YOU, Paul, do not
>have any more proof of Jehovah, then I do of my God.
>(though mine is better looking)! Thus, it is ignorant
>to believe in either, unless there is proof. You
>believe in something you cannot prove: this is an
>ignorant stand: a nicer word for it is called: Faith.
>And by the way, I've never stated whether I believe in
>God or not: I just don't believe in religion.
>
>
>=====Your ideas about the Koran and Islam
>>definately show you up for ignorant.You say the Koran
>>is Gods word to Muslims,"well thats me convinced!"
>>Muslims 'claim' God spoke to Mohammed after he spoke
>>to Moses,this would makes the Koran the bible of
>>choice 'if' it w

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.