VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]
Subject: One Billion Dollars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Author:
Oropan
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 16:20:56 03/05/07 Mon
In reply to: jw 's message, "Re: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" on 09:54:36 03/05/07 Mon

You really do make up the stuff you post!!!!!!

Estimated Annual Retirement Benefit: $8,187,200*

*Calculated by The Corporate Library for the AFL-CIO Executive PayWatch



Exxon Mobil CEO Lee R. Raymond’s retirement in January 2006 coincided with record profits for Exxon Mobil. On retirement, Raymond was entitled to receive an estimated annual retirement benefit of over $8 million.[1] He choose instead to take a lump sum payment of $98 million.[2] Raymond will also get an administrative assistant, company-provided life insurance, a car, driver, and airplane use for two years.[3]



Like many CEOs, Raymond’s pension is calculated based on his highest average salary and bonus over a three-year period. Between 2002 and 2005, Raymond’s annual bonus more than doubled from $2.1 million to $4.9 million.[4] According to Exxon Mobil, long-term returns on capital, growth in earnings per share and operating results are key considerations in determining the CEO’s salary and bonus.[5]

Also:
Michael Moore
owns Halliburton!
New book debunks claims of celebrity activists

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 1, 2005
10:23 p.m. Eastern


© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

Michael Moore

"I don't own a single share of stock!" filmmaker Michael Moore proudly proclaimed.

He's right. He doesn't own a single share. He owns tens of thousands of shares – including nearly 2,000 shares of Boeing, nearly 1,000 of Sonoco, more than 4,000 of Best Foods, more than 3,000 of Eli Lilly, more than 8,000 of Bank One and more than 2,000 of Halliburton, the company most vilified by Moore in "Fahrenheit 9/11."





If you want to see Moore's own signed Schedule D declaring his capital gains and losses where his stock ownership is listed, it's emblazoned on the cover of Peter Schweizer's new book, "Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy."

And it's just one of the startling revelations by Schweizer, famous for his previous works, "Reagan's War" and "The Bushes."

Other examples:


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who proclaims her support for unions, yet the luxury resort, the vineyard and the restaurants she partly owns are strictly non-union. While she advocates tough new laws enforcing environmental regulations on the private sector, the exclusive country club she partly owns failed to comply with existing environmental regulations for the past eight years – including a failure to protect endangered species.

Noam Chomsky has made a reputation for calling America a police state and branding the Pentagon "the most hideous institution on earth," yet his entire academic career, writes Schweizer, has been subsidized by the U.S. military.

Barbra Streisand is another proponent of environmentalism, yet she drives an SUV, lives in a mansion and has a $22,000 annual water bill. In the past, she has driven to appointments in Beverly Hills in a motor home because of her aversion to using public bathrooms.

Ralph Nader plays the role of the citizen avenger – the populist uninterested in wealth and materialism, pretending to live in a modest apartment. In fact, he lives in fancy homes registered in the names of his siblings.
This is not just a book of "gotcha" journalism, explains Schweizer. He says the dozens and dozens of examples of "liberal hypocrisy" he cites in his book "are of central importance in evaluating the validity and usefulness of liberal ideas."

"Using IRS records, court depositions, news reports, financial disclosures and their own statements, I sought to answer a particular question: Do these liberal leaders and activists practice what they preach?" he writes. "What I found was a stunning record of open and shameless hypocrisy. Those who champion the cause of organized labor had developed various methods to avoid paying union wages or shunned unions altogether.

"Those who believe that the rich need to pay more in taxes proved especially adept at avoiding taxes themselves. Critics of capitalism and corporate enterprise frequently invested in the very companies they denounced. Those who espouse strict environmental regulations worked vigorously to sidestep them when it came to their own businesses and properties. Those who advocate steep inheritance taxes to promote fairer income distribution hid their investments in trusts or exotic overseas locales to reduce their own tax liability. Those who are strong proponents of affirmative action rarely practiced it themselves, and some had abysmal records when it came to hiring minorities. Those who proclaim themselves champions of civil liberties when it comes to criminal or terrorist cases went to extraordinary lengths to curtail the civil liberties of others when they felt threatened or just inconvenienced. Advocates of gun control had no problem making sure that an arsenal of weapons was available to protect them from dangerous criminals."





> How can the dems cut more from the war funding than
>bush has already cut, it's not like the war was ever
>funded!
>
> All rich should pay for the war, including exxon
>business crook lee raymond who stole a billion dollars
>from the american people last year, about a hundred
>times what micheal moore made off his movie, and
>micheal moore agrees with me. Goerge soros probably
>also agrees with me, he funds a radio network that
>calls for tax increased for the filthy rich, he at
>least recognizes his gains were ill-gotten.
>
>>So why aren't they cutting
>>funding?????????????????????????
>>BTW, I do agree we should tax the Hell out of rich
>>movie stars and big money crooks like George Soros and
>>other assorted rich guys like Micheal Moore. I'd
>>suggest 99.9% tax for them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Congress can only cut funding for the war, they
>can
>>>not directly stop it, only bush can do that. Bush
>and
>>>the previous republican congress never funded the
>war,
>>>they were too busy giving tax breaks to the filthy
>>>rich so we are losing the war on terror. Bush sends
>>>our troops into combat without equipment and
>training,
>>>as canon fodder, and wants to blame the democrats for
>>>his failure, that doesn't fly. Most americans
>>>supported the war until it became clear that bush and
>>>the republicans have no intention winning this war,
>it
>>>is now time to stop sending our troops to die for
>>>halliburton and exxon.
>>>
>>>>You and all the 'other' people elected these
>>>>guys.....now you are telling me they lied to you.
>>>>LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>!
>>!
>>>!
>>>>!!!!
>>>>Maybe they are too busy working on the
>>deficit?.....or
>>>>at least adding that $10,000,000,000.00 as add ons.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>she starts most posts with lol so she cannot be
>>>>>missed. THe majority of the people are against the
>>>wAR
>>>>>if you ever bothered to read anything other than
>>>right
>>>>>wing stuff or listening to right wing tv or radio .
>>>GO
>>>>>to polling place its bipartisian and see what
>people
>>>>>have to say about bush the war , the rep etc. might
>>>>>start you on a different track other than lol .Its
>>>>>obvious to thinking people that congressis not
>doing
>>>>>the peoples bidding .

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: One Billion Dollars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!jw19:51:25 03/07/07 Wed
You can't spell the word "WEALTHIEST" without the letters "ATHEIST", the language is telling us something! n/tjw19:53:20 03/07/07 Wed


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.