Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
Subject: Re: New cliimate treaty meetings . | |
Author: billvon |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 10:18:22 12/10/07 Mon In reply to: Duncan7 's message, "Re: New cliimate treaty meetings ." on 22:40:09 12/06/07 Thu >So, are you happy with their progress? Who's "they?" Car companies? US car companies - no. They're still doing a pretty bad job overall. They have some good ideas in the pipeline. The new CAFE laws will bring those ideas from car shows onto the streets. >I don't see how >you can be. just because this loophole or that is >created that doesn't mean people have to take >advantage of it. Nonsense. If there's a loophole in the tax law that lets you legally pay $5000 less tax - will you take it? Or will you "not take advantage" of the system? >It's people who create these markets. >manufacturers wouldn't make them if there wasn't >profit in it. You can have all the meetings and >treaties you want, but if money isn't being made in >the process your system is faulty. That is EXACTLY right. You have to set up a system in which car companies can make money by building cars people will buy. Which is what CAFE does. >If you aren't supported by >the vast majority of the population your doomed to >failure. Yep - and the majority of the population is now aware that global warming is a problem we have to deal with. >You can say what you want about my choices >but the truth is i'm outside what others do and have >gotten the job done already. It didn't take a meeting >or debate. It took an evaluation of what i was going >to need to satisfy my demand and that is where your >failing. What are you talking about? >You haven't even begun the evaluation of your >projected requirements in any realistic manner. Just a >bunch of claims and unrealistic targets. You deal in >absolutes. Good luck with that. It's worked for me. I generate more electricity than I use. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
Subject | Author | Date |
Re: New cliimate treaty meetings . | Oropan | 09:26:07 12/11/07 Tue |
|