VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Most scientific organization and environmental scientist agree with teh findings indicating antrhopogenic global warming


Author:
Stephen
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:52:04 01/01/08 Tue
In reply to: Oropan 's message, "Re: and do a research on the names the inhohfe rep" on 13:34:27 12/21/07 Fri

In science, we have what are called "experts in a field". Their job is to study a particular aspect of science in more detail than other scientists.

These are the persons we turn to for expert opinion.

These are also the very same scientists who sit on the IPCC committees. They are our planet's experts.

So although you may find a small fraction of scientists who disagree with the experts, for the most part, these people do not know the science and are only being disagreeable because their personal or political philosophies would be in contradiction if they did agree with the experts.

Get it? Science is not a democracy.

>What I find interesting is that anyone who questions
>manmade global warming is a lier as far as you and
>other econuts are concerned. That is a trait of a
>religious zeolot.
>AND, "scientific consensus" is NOT scientific FACT, If
>it was, we would still be believing the Earth was flat
>with the Sun revolving around it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> and inohohofe is the jerk who helt senate meetings on
>>global warming and only invited scientists who agree
>>with him plus
>>
>>
>>do the research on those 400 at these links..
>> you'll find they are hacks for exxon for the most
>>part...
>>
>>grab the names that are signed there and research them
>>heres an example... on fred "cigarettes are not bad
>>for you" singer
>>
>> >>href="http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet
>.
>>php?id...">http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfact
>s
>>heet.php?id...

>>
>>or
>>
>> >>href="http://www.desmogblog.com/s-fred-singer">http://
>w
>>ww.desmogblog.com/s-fred-singer

>>
>>
>>just takes a little wanting to actually know who's
>>lying to you and why.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.