VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456[7]8910 ]
Subject: Re: Spin? I put the number in context. You attempted to isloate it to understate its significance.


Author:
Oropan
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:00:34 04/12/07 Thu
In reply to: Mo' Green 's message, "Spin? I put the number in context. You attempted to isloate it to understate its significance." on 10:45:13 04/12/07 Thu

Com'on Mo, you know absolutly nothing is going to happen or change much with this Congress and as far as Bush....he will be President for the next one and three quarter's years and then he will retire just like other Presidents. I know you hate the guy but he is not running for reelection and I sure he could care less about people like you badmouthing him. I do have a problem with people like you that are rooting for the defeat of the US. I'm not sure you realize the implications of your wishes.








>BTW, how do you spot a trend from one number?
>Perspective is everything. Looks like bush has a lot
>to worry about from you observation below.
>
>>I've never been a fan of Congress....DEm or Rep. The
>>less they do the better I like it. I guess If you ran
>>a business where 60% of your customers didn't like or
>>approve of you, you wouldn't last very long.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Numbers in isolation mean nothing. You have to put
>>>them in perspective.
>>>
>>>>>You're clueless as usual.
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>href="http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm">htt
>p
>>:
>>>/
>>>>/
>>>>>www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm

>>>>>
>>>>>NBC/Wall Street Journal RV
>>>>> 9/8-11/06 20 approval 65 disaproval
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I guess that means 60% disapprove. That ain't
>>gone
>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>win ya too many elections.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why does he get everything arse backwards?
>>>>>>>>>Well, we all know he's a worthless
>>>prognosticator;
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>href="http://www.voy.com/60108/19835.html">http
>:
>>/
>>>/
>>>>w
>>>>>w
>>>>>>w
>>>>>>>.
>>>>>>>>v
>>>>>>>>>oy.com/60108/19835.html

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/334
>1
>>4
>>>5
>>>>,
>>>>>C
>>>>>>S
>>>>>>>T
>>>>>>>>-
>>>>>>>>>NWS-cong10.article">http://www.suntimes.com/new
>s
>>/
>>>p
>>>>o
>>>>>l
>>>>>>i
>>>>>>>t
>>>>>>>>i
>>>>>>>>>cs/334145,CST-NWS-cong10.article

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Congress enjoys something new -- public
>>approval
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>April 10, 2007
>>>>>>>>>Public approval for Congress is at its highest
>>>>>level
>>>>>>>>>in a year as Democrats mark 100 days in power
>>and
>>>>>>>step
>>>>>>>>>up their confrontation with President Bush over
>>>>his
>>>>>>>>>handling of the Iraq war, the issue that
>>>>>overshadows
>>>>>>>>>all others.
>>>>>>>>>Overall approval for Congress is 40 percent.
>The
>>>>>>>>>survey shows Bush's approval ratings remain in
>>>the
>>>>>>>>>mid-30 percent range.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>''The Democrats are back,'' Rep. Nancy Pelosi,
>>>the
>>>>>>>>>first woman speaker in history, had exulted on
>>>>Jan.
>>>>>>3
>>>>>>>>>as her party claimed control for the first time
>>>in
>>>>>>>>>more than a decade.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>While Iraq has dominated since then, Democrats
>>>>also
>>>>>>>>>quickly showcased their domestic priorities and
>>>>>used
>>>>>>>>>their power to convene hearings to embarrass
>the
>>>>>>>>>administration. AP

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Oh, BTW...Oropan11:03:07 04/12/07 Thu


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.