VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Friday, May 08, 10:32:00amLogin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]345 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wednesday, June 05, 04:38:40pm
Author: M's nemesis
Subject: Re: 222 Studebaker trucks
In reply to: Hugh 's message, "222 Studebaker trucks" on Wednesday, June 05, 03:31:45pm

I agree it is American hardware that won the war, without a shadow of a doubt. Combat-wise you were not that effective in Europe (similarities with WW1) until late, got embroiled in Italy, many of your elite troops like the rangers were created and trained by the Brits.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

  • I'm not one to wallow in -- M's nemesis, Wednesday, June 05, 04:56:57pm




  • I'm well aware how our military has been misused -- Hugh, Thursday, June 06, 06:13:45am





    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]





    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.